Animals in Mortuary Practices of Bronze-Age Pastoral Societies: Caprine Use at the Site of Dunping in Northwestern China
- PMID: 38136830
- PMCID: PMC10740612
- DOI: 10.3390/ani13243794
Animals in Mortuary Practices of Bronze-Age Pastoral Societies: Caprine Use at the Site of Dunping in Northwestern China
Abstract
The late second and first millennium BC witnessed extensive economic, cultural, and political exchanges between pastoralists and sedentary farming states in East Asia. Decades of archaeological fieldwork across northern China have revealed a large number of burial sites associated with pastoralists during the first millennium BC. These sites were characterized by the inhumation of specific animal parts in burials, predominantly the skulls and hooves of sheep, goats, cattle, and horses. However, the selection preference for these animals and how they were integrated into the mortuary contexts of these pastoral societies remain poorly investigated. Here, we report a preliminary analysis of caprine remains from 70 burials at the site of Dunping in the southern Gansu region of northwestern China, dated to approximately the seventh to fourth centuries BC. Based on an examination of species composition, post-depositional effects, traces of human alteration, skeletal element representation, and age at death, we discussed the selection, slaughtering, and inhumation of caprines concerning the mortuary practices at the site. Comparisons between Dunping and several other contemporaneous burial sites in neighboring regions, specifically in terms of the mortality profiles, further highlight distinct patterns in the selection of caprines for mortuary purposes among pastoral societies. These differences suggest varying degrees of emphasis placed on the economic and social significance attributed to caprines. Our findings provide new insights into the roles that caprines played in both ritual performances and subsistence practices among pastoralists in East Asia during the first millennium BC.
Keywords: China; age at death; mortuary practice; pastoralist; sheep and goat; the first millennium BC; zooarchaeology.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.
Figures










References
-
- Davis S. The Archaeology of Animals. Yale University Press; New Haven, CT, USA: 1987.
-
- Clutton-Brock J. A Natural History of Domesticate Mammals. 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press; Cambridge, UK: 1999.
-
- Reitz E.J., Wing E. Zooarchaeology. 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press; Cambridge, UK: 2008.
-
- O’Connor T. Animals as Neighbors: The Past and Present of Commensal Animals. Michigan State University Press; East Lansing, MI, USA: 2014.
-
- Gifford-Gonzalez D. An Introduction to Zooarchaeology. Springer International Publishing; Cham, Switzerland: 2018.
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources