Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comment
. 2023 Nov 27;14(12):2135.
doi: 10.3390/genes14122135.

Propidium Monoazide-Treated, Cell-Direct, Quantitative PCR for Detecting Viable Chloramphenicol-Resistant Escherichia coli and Corynebacterium glutamicum Cells

Affiliations
Comment

Propidium Monoazide-Treated, Cell-Direct, Quantitative PCR for Detecting Viable Chloramphenicol-Resistant Escherichia coli and Corynebacterium glutamicum Cells

Yang Qin et al. Genes (Basel). .

Abstract

With the rapid development and commercialization of industrial genetically modified microorganisms (GMMs), public concerns regarding their potential effects are on the rise. It is imperative to promptly monitor the unintended release of viable GMMs into wastewater, the air, and the surrounding ecosystems to prevent the risk of horizontal gene transfer to native microorganisms. In this study, we have developed a method that combines propidium monoazide (PMA) with a dual-plex quantitative PCR (qPCR) approach based on TaqMan probes. This method targets the chloramphenicol-resistant gene (CmR) along with the endogenous genes D-1-deoxyxylulose 5-phosphate synthase (dxs) and chromosomal replication initiator protein (dnaA). It allows for the direct quantitative detection of viable genetically modified Escherichia coli and Corynebacterium glutamicum cells, eliminating the requirement for DNA isolation. The dual-plex qPCR targeting CmR/dxs and CmR/dnaA demonstrated excellent performance across various templates, including DNA, cultured cells, and PMA-treated cells. Repeatability and precision, defined as RSDr% and bias%, respectively, were calculated and found to fall within the acceptable limits specified by the European Network of GMO Laboratories (ENGL). Through PMA-qPCR assays, we determined the detection limits for viable chloramphenicol-resistant E. coli and C. glutamicum strains to be 20 and 51 cells, respectively, at a 95% confidence level. Notably, this method demonstrated superior sensitivity compared to Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA), which has a detection limit exceeding 1000 viable cells for both GM bacterial strains. This approach offers the potential to accurately and efficiently detect viable cells of GMMs, providing a time-saving and cost-effective solution.

Keywords: chloramphenicol-resistant; genetically modified microorganisms; propidium monoazide treatment; quantitative PCR; viable cells detection.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
DNA standard curves for the antibiotic-resistant gene CmR and taxon-specific endogenous genes dxs and dnaA of E. coli and C. glutamicum, respectively, using single-plex or dual-plex quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) analysis. E—qPCR efficiency; R2—linear correlation coefficient. (A) CmR standard curve for E. coli; (B) dxs standard curve for E. coli; (C) CmR standard curve for C. glutamicum; (D) dnaA standard curve for C. glutamicum.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Quantitative PCR assays targeting CmR/dxs and CmR/dnaA genes using cell-direct dual-plex and propidium monoazide (PMA)-treated qPCR methods. (A,B) CmR and dxs qPCR assays were used to detect genetically modified E. coli cells in serially diluted cell and PMA-treated cell suspensions, respectively; (C,D) CmR and dnaA qPCR assays were used to detect genetically modified C. glutamicum cells in serially diluted cell and PMA-treated cell suspensions, respectively. Black dots indicate the average Cq values of diluted cell points; red dots indicate the average Cq values of PMA-treated diluted cell points.

Comment on

Similar articles

References

    1. Redenbaugh K., Hiatt W., Martineau B., Emlay D. Regulatory assessment of the FLAVR SAVR tomato. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 1994;5:105–110. doi: 10.1016/0924-2244(94)90197-X. - DOI
    1. Paes B.G., Almeida J.R. Genetic improvement of microorganisms for applications in biorefineries. Chem. Biol. Technol. Agric. 2014;1:1–10. doi: 10.1186/s40538-014-0021-1. - DOI
    1. Wesseler J., Kleter G., Meulenbroek M., Purnhagen K.P. EU regulation of genetically modified microorganisms in light of new policy developments: Possible implications for EU bioeconomy investments. Appl. Econ. Perspect. Policy. 2023;45:839–859. doi: 10.1002/aepp.13259. - DOI
    1. Basarkar V., Govardhane S., Shende P. Multifaceted applications of genetically modified micro-organisms: A biotechnological revolution. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2022;28:1833–1842. doi: 10.2174/1381612828666220128102823. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Philips J.G., Martin-Avila E., Robold A.V. Horizontal gene transfer from genetically modified plants—Regulatory considerations. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2022;10:971402. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.971402. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources