Temporal Shift Length and Antecedent Occurrence Likelihood Modulate Counterfactual Conditional Comprehension: Evidence from Event-Related Potentials
- PMID: 38137172
- PMCID: PMC10741727
- DOI: 10.3390/brainsci13121724
Temporal Shift Length and Antecedent Occurrence Likelihood Modulate Counterfactual Conditional Comprehension: Evidence from Event-Related Potentials
Abstract
Counterfactual conditionals posit hypothetical scenarios in which antecedent events contradict reality. This study examined whether and how the processing difficulty of Chinese counterfactual conditionals (yaobushi, equivalent to if it had not been for in English) can be affected by the length of temporal shifts of the events across clauses and the likelihood of the antecedent occurrence. Participants read Chinese counterfactuals that contained either long (e.g., qunian-xianzai [last year-right now]) or short temporal shifts (e.g., zuotian-xianzai [yesterday-right now]) within highly likely (e.g., sign up for school activity) or less likely contexts (e.g., sign up for Arctic scientific research). ERP results revealed a significant N400 interaction between the temporal shift length and antecedent likelihood on the temporal indicators in the consequent and the sentence-ending verbs. Specifically, the less likely events elicited larger negativity than highly likely events with short temporal shifts on the temporal indicator. On the sentence-ending word, the long temporal shift elicited enlarged negativity than the short temporal shift when the antecedent was highly likely. These findings have two key implications regarding the interplay of implied causality and falsity constraints during counterfactual comprehension. First, salient falsity constraints can override effects of causal coherence on processing. Second, greater negativity for unlikely antecedents suggests that counterfactual markers concurrently activate factual and hypothetical representations.
Keywords: Chinese counterfactuals; N400; implied causal relationship; likelihood of occurrence; temporal shift.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures



Similar articles
-
Exploring Pragmatic Factors on the Logical Relationships of Conditional Reasoning: A Study of Counterfactual and Hypothetical Conditionals.Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Aug 8;14(8):686. doi: 10.3390/bs14080686. Behav Sci (Basel). 2024. PMID: 39199082 Free PMC article.
-
Examining the cognitive costs of counterfactual language comprehension: Evidence from ERPs.Brain Res. 2015 Oct 5;1622:252-69. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2015.05.024. Epub 2015 Jun 25. Brain Res. 2015. PMID: 26119912
-
Processing Attenuating NPIs in Indicative and Counterfactual Conditionals.Front Psychol. 2022 Jun 10;13:894396. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.894396. eCollection 2022. Front Psychol. 2022. PMID: 35756223 Free PMC article.
-
Marking the counterfactual: ERP evidence for pragmatic processing of German subjunctives.Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 Jul 25;8:548. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00548. eCollection 2014. Front Hum Neurosci. 2014. PMID: 25120452 Free PMC article.
-
If the real world were irrelevant, so to speak: The role of propositional truth-value in counterfactual sentence comprehension.Cognition. 2012 Jan;122(1):102-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2011.09.001. Epub 2011 Oct 1. Cognition. 2012. PMID: 21962826
Cited by
-
Exploring Pragmatic Factors on the Logical Relationships of Conditional Reasoning: A Study of Counterfactual and Hypothetical Conditionals.Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Aug 8;14(8):686. doi: 10.3390/bs14080686. Behav Sci (Basel). 2024. PMID: 39199082 Free PMC article.
-
Deep learning models for predicting the survival of patients with medulloblastoma based on a surveillance, epidemiology, and end results analysis.Sci Rep. 2024 Jun 24;14(1):14490. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-65367-9. Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 38914641 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Roese N.J., Sanna L.J., Galinsky A.D. The mechanics of imagination: Automaticity and control in counterfactual thinking. In: Hassin R.R., Uleman J.S., Bargh J.A., editors. The New Unconscious. Oxford University Press; Oxford, UK: 2006. pp. 138–170.
-
- Woodward J. Psychological studies of causal and counterfactual reasoning. In: Hoerl C., McCormack T., Beck S.R., editors. Understanding Counterfactuals, Understanding Causation: Issues in Philosophy and Psychology. Oxford University Press; Oxford, UK: 2011. pp. 16–53.
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources