The Utility of a Resting Electrocardiogram (ECG-PH Index) in Evaluating the Efficacy of Pulmonary Endarterectomy in Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension
- PMID: 38137690
- PMCID: PMC10743524
- DOI: 10.3390/jcm12247621
The Utility of a Resting Electrocardiogram (ECG-PH Index) in Evaluating the Efficacy of Pulmonary Endarterectomy in Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension
Abstract
Background: The ECG-PH index (PH-ECG score) has been proposed as a valuable ECG-derived method of evaluating the effectiveness of balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). Pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) is the main form of therapy for CTEPH with a proximal clot location. The objective of this study was to assess the clinical utility of a resting electrocardiogram (ECG-PH index) in assessing the effectiveness of PEA in CTEPH patients.
Methods: The retrospective analysis included 73 patients who underwent PEA. Their ECG-PH index values were calculated using four ECG parameters: R-wave amplitude V1 + S-wave amplitude V5/V6 > 10.5 mm, QRS-wave axis > 110 degrees, R-wave amplitude V1 > S-wave amplitude V1, and SIQIII pattern. PH-ECG scores were assessed after a median time of 13 months (IQR: 8-31 months) had passed since the PEA procedures.
Results: The current analysis documented that ECG-PH index = 0 is a good reflection of mPAP < 25mmHg (sensitivity 76.1%; specificity 66.7%; positive predictive value 79.5%; negative predictive value 62.1%) or mPAP ≤ 20 mmHg (sensitivity 69.6%; specificity 70.6%; positive predictive value 88.6%; negative predictive value 41.4%) after PEA. The values of the area under the ROC curve for ECG-PH index were 0.772 (95% CI: 0.676-0.867) and 0.743 (95% CI: 0.637-0.849) for the mPAP < 25 mmHg and mPAP ≤ 20 mmHg patient groups, respectively.
Conclusion: The ECG-PH index may be useful for monitoring the haemodynamic effect of PEA in CTEPH patients.
Keywords: chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension; electrocardiography; pulmonary endarterectomy; pulmonary hypertension.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures




References
-
- Humbert M., Kovacs G., Hoeper M.M., Badagliacca R., Berger R.M.F., Brida M., Carlsen J., Coats A.J.S., Escribano-Subias P., Ferrari P., et al. 2022 ESC/ERS Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary hypertension: Developed by the task force for the diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary hypertension of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Respiratory Society (ERS). Endorsed by the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) and the European Reference Network on rare respiratory diseases (ERN-LUNG) Eur. Heart J. 2022;43:3618–3731. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehac237. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Kopeć G., Dzikowska-Diduch O., Mroczek E., Mularek-Kubzdela T., Chrzanowski L., Skoczylas I., Tomaszewski M., Peregud-Pogorzelska M., Karasek D., Lewicka E., et al. Characteristics and outcomes of patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension in the era of modern therapeutic approaches: Data from the Polish multicenter registry (BNP-PL) Ther. Adv. Chronic Dis. 2021;12:20406223211002961. doi: 10.1177/20406223211002961. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Mayer E., Jenkins D., Lindner J., D’armini A., Kloek J., Meyns B., Ilkjaer L.B., Klepetko W., Delcroix M., Lang I., et al. Surgical management and outcome of patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: Results from an international prospective registry. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2011;141:702–710. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2010.11.024. - DOI - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources