Molecular Determinants of Uterine Receptivity: Comparison of Successful Implantation, Recurrent Miscarriage, and Recurrent Implantation Failure
- PMID: 38139443
- PMCID: PMC10743587
- DOI: 10.3390/ijms242417616
Molecular Determinants of Uterine Receptivity: Comparison of Successful Implantation, Recurrent Miscarriage, and Recurrent Implantation Failure
Abstract
Embryo implantation is one of the most remarkable phenomena in human reproduction and is not yet fully understood. Proper endometrial function as well as a dynamic interaction between the endometrium itself and the blastocyst-the so-called embryo-maternal dialog-are necessary for successful implantation. Several physiological and molecular processes are involved in the success of implantation. This review describes estrogen, progesterone and their receptors, as well as the role of the cytokines interleukin (IL)-6, IL-8, leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF), IL-11, IL-1, and the glycoprotein glycodelin in successful implantation, in cases of recurrent implantation failure (RIF) and in cases of recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL). Are there differences at the molecular level underlying RIF or RPL? Since implantation has already taken place in the case of RPL, it is conceivable that different molecular biological baseline situations underlie the respective problems.
Keywords: cytokines; implantation; recurrent implantation failure; recurrent pregnancy loss; uterine receptivity.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures

Similar articles
-
Integrative Analyses of Uterine Transcriptome and MicroRNAome Reveal Compromised LIF-STAT3 Signaling and Progesterone Response in the Endometrium of Patients with Recurrent/Repeated Implantation Failure (RIF).PLoS One. 2016 Jun 15;11(6):e0157696. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0157696. eCollection 2016. PLoS One. 2016. PMID: 27304912 Free PMC article.
-
Decreased MUC1 in endometrium is an independent receptivity marker in recurrent implantation failure during implantation window.Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2018 Jun 21;16(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s12958-018-0379-1. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2018. PMID: 29929546 Free PMC article.
-
Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy: a comparison of live birth rates in patients with recurrent pregnancy loss due to embryonic aneuploidy or recurrent implantation failure.Hum Reprod. 2019 Dec 1;34(12):2340-2348. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dez229. Hum Reprod. 2019. PMID: 31811307
-
Physiological and pathological angiogenesis in endometrium at the time of embryo implantation.Am J Reprod Immunol. 2017 Aug;78(2). doi: 10.1111/aji.12693. Epub 2017 May 3. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2017. PMID: 28466568 Review.
-
Clinical Relevance of Vaginal and Endometrial Microbiome Investigation in Women with Repeated Implantation Failure and Recurrent Pregnancy Loss.Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Jan 3;25(1):622. doi: 10.3390/ijms25010622. Int J Mol Sci. 2024. PMID: 38203793 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Inflammatory Changes after Medical Suppression of Suspected Endometriosis for Implantation Failure: Preliminary Results.Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Jun 22;25(13):6852. doi: 10.3390/ijms25136852. Int J Mol Sci. 2024. PMID: 38999962 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
ODEP-Based Robotic System for Micromanipulation and In-Flow Analysis of Primary Cells.Cyborg Bionic Syst. 2025 Mar 6;6:0234. doi: 10.34133/cbsystems.0234. eCollection 2025. Cyborg Bionic Syst. 2025. PMID: 40391170 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of Nonablative Er-YAG Laser on Human Endometrial Stromal Cells (hESCs): A Pilot Study.Lasers Surg Med. 2025 Jul;57(5):415-425. doi: 10.1002/lsm.70020. Epub 2025 Apr 24. Lasers Surg Med. 2025. PMID: 40275553 Free PMC article.
References
-
- D’Occhio M.J., Campanile G., Zicarelli L., Visintin J.A., Baruselli P.S. Adhesion molecules in gamete transport, fertilization, early embryonic development, and implantation-role in establishing a pregnancy in cattle: A review. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 2020;87:206–222. doi: 10.1002/mrd.23312. - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources