Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2023 Dec 7;15(24):5030.
doi: 10.3390/nu15245030.

High Protein Oral Nutritional Supplements Enable the Majority of Cancer Patients to Meet Protein Intake Recommendations during Systemic Anti-Cancer Treatment: A Randomised Controlled Parallel-Group Study

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

High Protein Oral Nutritional Supplements Enable the Majority of Cancer Patients to Meet Protein Intake Recommendations during Systemic Anti-Cancer Treatment: A Randomised Controlled Parallel-Group Study

Anne-Marie Dingemans et al. Nutrients. .

Abstract

ESPEN guidelines recommend a minimum protein intake of 1.0 g/kg body weight (BW) per day to maintain or restore lean body mass in patients with cancer. During anti-cancer treatment, optimal protein intake is difficult to achieve. We investigated whether a high-protein, low-volume oral nutritional supplement (ONS) supports patients in meeting recommendations. A multi-centre, randomised, controlled, open-label, parallel-group study was carried out in nine hospitals (five countries) between January 2019 and July 2021 in colorectal and lung cancer patients undergoing first-line systemic treatment with chemo(radio-) or immunotherapy. Subjects were randomised (2:1) to receive Fortimel Compact Protein® or standard care. Protein intake was assessed with a 3-day food diary (primary outcome). BW was a secondary outcome. Due to challenges in recruitment, the study was terminated prematurely with 42 patients randomised (intervention group (IG) 28; control group (CG) 14). At T1 and T2, protein intake was statistically significantly higher in the IG compared to the CG (1.40 vs. 1.07 g/kg/day at T1, p = 0.008; 1.32 vs. 0.94 g/kg/day at T2, p = 0.002). At baseline, only 65% (IG) and 45% (CG) of patients met ESPEN minimum protein intake recommendations. However, at T1 and T2 in the IG, a higher proportion of patients met recommendations than in the CG (88% vs. 55% and 40%). No statistically significant difference between study groups was observed for BW. Mean compliance to the ONS was 73.4%. A high-protein, low-volume ONS consumed twice daily enables the majority of patients to reach minimal ESPEN protein recommendations.

Keywords: cancer; high protein; malnutrition; nutrition support; oral nutritional supplements.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

N.v.W., F.S, M.Y.-E.S., E.B., W.L. and S.K. declare no conflict of interest. A.-M.D. has (to her institution) received grants from or has contracts with AMGEN, the Dutch Cancer Society and HANART. A.-M.D. has (to her institution) received consulting fees from AMGEN, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Sanofy, Roche, Jansen and Astra Zeneca. A.-M.D. has participated on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board for Takeda and Roche. A.-M.D. has held the position of Chair (unpaid) for the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Lung Cancer Group. M.V. and C.A.v.d.B. are employed by Danone Nutricia Research. The funders contributed to the design of the study; in the collection, analyses and interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; and in the decision to publish the results.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic representation of the study design. Timing of some measurements vary depending on the length of the anti-cancer treatment cycle (see Supplementary Material Figure S1B–D).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Flow diagram for selection, randomisation and analysis of study subjects [30] (mITT, modified Intention-To-Treat).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Protein intake g/kg BW/day (mITT). ESPEN recommendation for protein intake: 1.0–1.5 g/kg BW/day; mITT, modified Intention-to-Treat; BW, body weight ** p < 0.01.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Proportion of subjects (%) with protein intake ≥1.0 g/kg BW/day at study timepoints T0, T1, T2, T3 in IG and CG (mITT). * At all timepoints, there was some missing data: at T1 IG: n = 1; T2 IG: n = 10, CG: n = 1; T3 IG n = 9, CG: n = 2.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Study product compliance during the 12-week intervention (mean with 95% CI) (mITT).

References

    1. Zhang X., Tang M., Zhang Q., Zhang K.P., Guo Z.Q., Xu H.X., Yuan K.T., Yu M., Braga M., Cederholm T., et al. The GLIM criteria as an effective tool for nutrition assessment and survival prediction in older adult cancer patients. Clin. Nutr. 2021;40:1224–1232. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2020.08.004. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Arends J., Baracos V., Bertz H., Bozzetti F., Calder P.C., Deutz N.E.P., Erickson N., Laviano A., Lisanti M.P., Lobo D.N., et al. ESPEN expert group recommendations for action against cancer-related malnutrition. Clin. Nutr. 2017;36:1187–1196. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2017.06.017. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Muscaritoli M., Lucia S., Farcomeni A., Lorusso V., Saracino V., Barone C., Plastino F., Gori S., Magarotto R., Carteni G., et al. Prevalence of malnutrition in patients at first medical oncology visit: The PreMiO study. Oncotarget. 2017;8:79884–79896. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.20168. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Arends J., Bachmann P., Baracos V., Barthelemy N., Bertz H., Bozzetti F., Fearon K., Hütterer E., Isenring E., Kaasa S., et al. ESPEN guidelines on nutrition in cancer patients. Clin. Nutr. 2017;36:11–48. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2016.07.015. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hébuterne X., Lemarié E., Michallet M., de Montreuil C.B., Schneider S.M., Goldwasser F. Prevalence of malnutrition and current use of nutrition support in patients with cancer. JPEN J. Parenter. Enter. Nutr. 2014;38:196–204. doi: 10.1177/0148607113502674. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types