A meta-analysis of the risk factors for neurosurgical surgical site infection following craniotomy
- PMID: 38140754
- PMCID: PMC10961046
- DOI: 10.1111/iwj.14542
A meta-analysis of the risk factors for neurosurgical surgical site infection following craniotomy
Retraction in
-
RETRACTION: A Meta-Analysis of the Risk Factors for Neurosurgical Surgical Site Infection Following Craniotomy.Int Wound J. 2025 Apr;22(4):e70520. doi: 10.1111/iwj.70520. Int Wound J. 2025. PMID: 40814910 Free PMC article.
Abstract
The purpose of the meta-analysis was to evaluate and compare the risk factors for neurosurgical surgical site infection (SSI) after craniotomy. Using dichotomous or contentious random or fixed effect models, the odds ratio (OR) and mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were computed based on the examination of the meta-analysis results. Eighteen analyses, covering 11 068 craniotomies between 2001 and 2023, were included in the current meta-analysis. Subjects with SSIs had a significantly younger age (MD, -2.49; 95% CI, -2.95 to -2.04, p < 0.001), longer operation duration (MD, 10.21; 95% CI, 6.49-13.94, p < 0.001) and longer length of postoperative hospital stay (MD, 1.52; 95% CI, 0.45-2.60, p = 0.006) compared to subjects with no SSI with craniotomy. However, no significant difference was found between craniotomy subjects with SSIs and with no SSI in gender (OR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.76-1.07, p = 0.23), and combination with other infection (OR, 3.93; 95% CI, 0.28-56.01, p = 0.31). The data that were looked at showed that younger age, longer operation duration and longer length of postoperative hospital stay can be considered as risk factors of SSI in subjects with craniotomy; however, gender and combination with other infections are not. Nonetheless, consideration should be given to their values because several studies only involved a small number of patients, and there are not many studies available for some comparisons.
Keywords: craniotomy; length of postoperative hospital stay; operation duration; risk factor; surgical site infection.
© 2023 The Authors. International Wound Journal published by Medicalhelplines.com Inc and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Edwards JR, Peterson KD, Mu Y, et al. National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) report: data summary for 2006 through 2008, issued December 2009. Am J Infect Control. 2009;37(10):783‐805. - PubMed
-
- Plowman R. The socioeconomic burden of hospital acquired infection. Eurosurveillance. 2000;5(4):49‐50. - PubMed
-
- Johans SJ, Burkett DJ, Swong KN, Patel CR, Germanwala AV. Antibiotic prophylaxis and infection prevention for endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery: our protocol, results, and review of the literature. J Clin Neurosci. 2018;47:249‐253. - PubMed
-
- Agarwal A, Borkar SA, Kapil A, et al. Follow‐up study on the effect of risk‐stratified, protocol‐based perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis on postoperative infections in a tertiary care neurosurgical department over 10 years (2007–2016). Ind J Neurosurg. 2018;7(1):29‐35.
-
- Chiang H‐Y, Kamath AS, Pottinger JM, et al. Risk factors and outcomes associated with surgical site infections after craniotomy or craniectomy. J Neurosurg. 2014;120(2):509‐521. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
