Second annual report from the ISSPP PIPAC database
- PMID: 38144218
- PMCID: PMC10739278
- DOI: 10.1515/pp-2023-0047
Second annual report from the ISSPP PIPAC database
Abstract
Objectives: To monitor the results of PIPAC directed therapy based on data from the International Society for the Study of the Pleura and Peritoneum (ISSPP) PIPAC database.
Methods: Analysis of data from patients entered between June 15th, 2020, and February 28th, 2023.
Results: Twelve centers reported 2,456 PIPAC procedures in 809 patients (median 2, range 1-18) with peritoneal metastasis (PM) from different primary tumors. Approximately 90 % had systemic chemotherapy prior to PIPAC. Twenty-eight percent were treated in prospective protocols. Overall non-access rate was 3.5 %. Concomitant surgical procedures were performed during PIPAC in 1.6 % of the patients. Median length of stay was 2 days. A total of 95 surgical complications were recorded, but only 22 % of these were graded ≥3b. Seventeen-hundred-and-three adverse events were noted, and 8 % were classified ≥3. The rate of complete or major histological response (peritoneal regression grade score, PRGS≤2) increased between the first and the third PIPAC in the group of patients who were evaluated by PRGS, and a PRGS ≤2 or a reduction of the mean PRGS of at least 1 between first and third PIPAC were observed in 80 %. Disease progression (50 %) or technical issues (19 %) were the most important reasons for stopping PIPAC treatment. Median overall survival from first PIPAC directed treatment varied from 10.7 months (CI 8.7-12.5) in gastric cancer to 27.1 months (16.4-50.5) in mesothelioma.
Conclusions: The ISSPP PIPAC database provides substantial real-world data supporting the use of PIPAC directed therapy in patients with PM from different primary tumors.
Keywords: ISSPP; PIPAC; database; peritoneal metastasis.
© 2023 the author(s), published by De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: Olivier Glehen is consultant for GAMIDA. Marc Pocard is consultant for Thermasolutions. M. Pocard receives Research funding by Capnomed GmbH, IDImed, Thermasolutions as INSERM laboratory unit U 1275 responsible for peritoneal metastasis research. All other authors state no conflict of interest.
References
-
- Solass W, Kerb R, Mürdter T, Giger-Pabst U, Strumberg D, Tempfer C, et al. Intraperitoneal chemotherapy of peritoneal carcinomatosis using pressurized aerosol as an alternative to liquid solution: first evidence for efficacy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21:553–9. doi: 10.1245/s10434-013-3213-1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Lurvink RJ, Van der Speeten K, Rovers KP, de Hingh IHJT. The emergence of pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy as a palliative treatment option for patients with diffuse peritoneal metastases: a narrative review. J Gastrointest Oncol. 2021;12:S259–70. doi: 10.21037/jgo-20-497. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources