Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Dec 21:15:1981-1997.
doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S436624. eCollection 2023.

Preterm Birth: Screening and Prediction

Affiliations
Review

Preterm Birth: Screening and Prediction

Lyndsay Creswell et al. Int J Womens Health. .

Abstract

Preterm birth (PTB) affects approximately 10% of births globally each year and is the most significant direct cause of neonatal death and of long-term disability worldwide. Early identification of women at high risk of PTB is important, given the availability of evidence-based, effective screening modalities, which facilitate decision-making on preventative strategies, particularly transvaginal sonographic cervical length (CL) measurement. There is growing evidence that combining CL with quantitative fetal fibronectin (qfFN) and maternal risk factors in the extensively peer-reviewed and validated QUanititative Innovation in Predicting Preterm birth (QUiPP) application can aid both the triage of patients who present as emergencies with symptoms of preterm labor and high-risk asymptomatic women attending PTB surveillance clinics. The QUiPP app risk of delivery thus supports shared decision-making with patients on the need for increased outpatient surveillance, in-patient treatment for preterm labor or simply reassurance for those unlikely to deliver preterm. Effective triage of patients at preterm gestations is an obstetric clinical priority as correctly timed administration of antenatal corticosteroids will maximise their neonatal benefits. This review explores the predictive capacity of existing predictive tests for PTB in both singleton and multiple pregnancies, including the QUiPP app v.2. and discusses promising new research areas, which aim to predict PTB through cervical stiffness and elastography measurements, metabolomics, extracellular vesicles and artificial intelligence.

Keywords: QUiPP; cervical length; fibronectin; preterm labor; screening.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Images to show two described methods for measuring cervical length (CL). Image (A) shows the straight-line method in a short cervix. Image (B) shows the two-lines method in a normal cervix, with calipers between the external os and the point of maximum curvature, and from the endpoint of the first line to the internal os. Images courtesy of Dr Lyndsay Creswell and Dr Neil O’Gorman.
Figure 2
Figure 2
An illustration demonstrating the use of the Pregnolia system, with the probe tip in contact with the anterior lip of the cervix, the need for a foot pedal to initiate the vacuum and the control unit to display the cervical stiffness index (CSI). Image courtesy of Dr Sabrina Badir.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Howson CP, Kinney MV, Lawn JE. March of dimes, PMNCH, save the children, WHO. In: Born Too Soon: The Global Action Report on Preterm Birth. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2012. Available from: https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/44864/9789241503433_eng.pdf?.... Accessed November 28, 2023.
    1. Goldenberg RL, Culhane JF, Iams JD, Romero R. Epidemiology and causes of preterm birth. Lancet. 2008;371(9606):75–84. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60074-4 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chawanpaiboon S, Vogel JP, Moller AB, et al. Global, regional, and national estimates of levels of preterm birth in 2014: a systematic review and modelling analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2019;7(1):e37–e46. doi:10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30451-0 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Costeloe KL, Hennessy EM, Haider S, Stacey F, Marlow N, Draper ES. Short term outcomes after extreme preterm birth in England: comparison of two birth cohorts in 1995 and 2006 (the EPICure studies). BMJ. 2012;345(dec04 3):e7976. doi:10.1136/bmj.e7976 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Santhakumaran S, Statnikov Y, Gray D, Battersby C, Ashby D, Modi N. Survival of very preterm infants admitted to neonatal care in England 2008–2014: time trends and regional variation. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2018;103(3):F208–F215. doi:10.1136/archdischild-2017-312748 - DOI - PMC - PubMed