Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Apr;30(3):418-428.
doi: 10.1111/jep.13947. Epub 2023 Dec 26.

Pathways: A guide for developing culturally safe and appropriate patient-reported outcome (PROMs) and experience measures (PREMs) with Indigenous peoples

Affiliations
Review

Pathways: A guide for developing culturally safe and appropriate patient-reported outcome (PROMs) and experience measures (PREMs) with Indigenous peoples

Lori d'Agincourt-Canning et al. J Eval Clin Pract. 2024 Apr.

Abstract

Background: Members of the Indigenous Health Program, BC Children's and Women's Hospitals and the University of British Columbia embarked on a joint project to describe best practices to support the creation of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) with Indigenous peoples.

Methods: The project involved a review of previous research on patient-reported measures (surveys) that had been specifically developed for Indigenous populations. It also involved interviews with key stakeholders-Indigenous and non-Indigenous academic researchers, and Indigenous community leaders and community members. Themes from the interviews and the literature review were combined and synthesized into pathways/a framework for survey development.

Results: The pathways document consisted of 13 protocols and associated teachings for guiding processes and framing survey questions. These encompassed building relationships, community engagement and consultation, benefits to community, ceremony and storytelling, two-way learning, participatory content development, governance and accountability. Findings emphasized the criticality of Indigenous leadership in setting priorities for PROMs and PREMS and establishing relationships that honour Indigenous experiences through all phases of a study. Assessment of the framework's validity with select research participants and the Project Advisory Committee was positive.

Conclusion: This is the first framework to guide development of PROMs and PREMs with Indigenous peoples and communities. It addresess both process and outcome and includes concrete steps that collaborators can take when establishing a partnership that is respectful and inclusive of Indigenous ways of knowing and being.

Keywords: Indigenous peoples; health service evaluation; patient‐reported experience measures; patient‐reported outcome measures.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

References

REFERENCES

    1. de Bienassis K, Kristensen S, Hewlett E, Roe D, Mainz J, Klazinga N. Measuring patient voice matters: setting the scene for patient‐reported indicators. Int J Qual Health Care. 2022;34(suppl ment_1):ii3‐ii6.
    1. Mainz J, Kristensen S, Roe D. The power of the patient's voice in the modern health care system. Inte J Qual Health Care. 2022;34(Suppl_1):ii1‐ii2.
    1. Lafond G, Haver CRA, McLeod V, Clarke S, Horsburgh B, McLeod KM. Characteristics and residence of First Nations patients and their use of health care services in Saskatchewan, Canada: informing First Nations and Métis health services. J Eval Clin Pract. 2017;23:294‐300.
    1. Harfield S, Pearson O, Morey K, et al. Assessing the quality of health research from an indigenous perspective: the aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander quality appraisal tool. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020;20:79. doi:10.1186/s12874-020-00959-3
    1. United Nations. State of the World's Indigenous Peoples. vol. 2. 2015.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources