Validation of the Back-table Graft Arterial Anastomosis Between the Splenic Artery and Superior Mesenteric Artery: Arterial Complications After a 21-year Single-center Experience of Pancreas Transplantation
- PMID: 38146951
- DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006188
Validation of the Back-table Graft Arterial Anastomosis Between the Splenic Artery and Superior Mesenteric Artery: Arterial Complications After a 21-year Single-center Experience of Pancreas Transplantation
Abstract
Objective: To determine the role of the arterial splenomesenteric anastomosis (ASMA) vascular reconstruction technique in terms of arterial vascular complications in pancreas transplantation (PT) recipients.
Background: The ASMA technique was first described in 1992 by the Hospital Clínic Barcelona group. Regardless that the iliac Y-graft technique is the most frequently used worldwide, evidence of arterial complications and implications of using a different back-table reconstruction is conspicuously absent in the literature.
Methods: Descriptive review of 407 PTs performed at a single center (1999-2019) by analyzing the type of arterial reconstruction technique, focusing on ASMA. The end points were the management of arterial complications and long-term patient and graft survival.
Results: ASMA was performed in 376 cases (92.4%) and a Y-graft in 31 cases (7.6%). A total of 34 arterial complications (8.3%) were diagnosed. In the ASMA group (n=30, 7.9%), they comprised 15 acute thrombosis, 4 stenosis, 1 pseudoaneurysm, and 10 diverse chronic arterial complications, whereas in the Y-graft group (n=4, 12.9%), 3 acute thrombosis and 1 chronic artery-duodenal fistula occurred. Graft salvage was achieved in 16 patients (53.3%) from the ASMA group and in 2 (50%) from the Y-graft. After a median follow-up of 129.2 (IQR 25-75%, 77.2-182) months, the overall graft and patient survival for the whole cohort at 1, 5, and 10 years were 86.7%, 79.5%, and 70.5%, and 98.5%, 95.3%, and 92.5%, respectively.
Conclusions: The ASMA proves to be a safe and more easily reproducible technique and could therefore be considered a safe alternative vascular reconstruction procedure to the Y-graft in the PT population.
Keywords: arterial complications; back-table vascular reconstruction; graft survival; pancreas transplantation; postoperative outcomes.
Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
J.F.-F.: Lecture fees from Bayer and AstraZeneca. Consultancy fees from AstraZeneca. J.F. received grant support from Instituto de Salud Carlos III (PI18/00161). V.S.: travel grants from Bayer. Consultancy fees from LEO Pharma. J.F.: received grant support from the “Llavaneres contra el càncer” Association (grant IP004500). The remaining authors report no conflicts of interest.
Comment in
-
Dueling with the dual artery blood supply in pancreas transplantation: why replace the Y?Gland Surg. 2024 Jul 30;13(7):1159-1163. doi: 10.21037/gs-24-121. Epub 2024 Jul 17. Gland Surg. 2024. PMID: 39175703 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Sutherland DER, Gruessner RWG, Dunn DL, et al. Lessons learned from more than 1,000 pancreas transplants at a single institution. Ann Surg. 2001;233:463–501.
-
- Sutherland DER, Gruessner RWG, Gruessner AC. Pancreas transplantation for treatment of diabetes mellitus. World J Surg. 2001;25:487–496.
-
- Khubutia MS, Pinchuk AV, Dmitriev IV, et al. Surgical complications after simultaneous pancreas–kidney transplantation: a single-center experience. Asian J Surg. 2016;39:232–237.
-
- Banga N, Hadjianastassiou VG, Mamode N, et al. Outcome of surgical complications following simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2012;27:1658–1663.
-
- Gruessner AC, Sutherland DER. Pancreas transplant outcomes for United States (US) and non-US cases as reported to the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) and the International Prancreas Transplant Registry (IPTR) as of June 2004. Clin Transplant. 2005;19:433–455.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
