Robot-assisted resection of benign splenic tumors in children
- PMID: 38147144
- PMCID: PMC10751254
- DOI: 10.1007/s00423-023-03208-5
Robot-assisted resection of benign splenic tumors in children
Abstract
Purpose: Robotic surgery is becoming increasingly widely used in the field of pediatric surgery. The present study aimed to evaluate the safety and feasibility of robot-assisted resection of benign pediatric splenic tumors and to discuss the technical points.
Methods: A total of 32 patients who were diagnosed with benign splenic tumors and underwent minimally invasive surgery from January 2017 to September 2023 were included in the study. The clinical data including demographic criteria, operative details, and postoperative outcomes were analyzed retrospectively.
Results: Thirteen patients underwent robot-assisted surgery, and 19 patients underwent laparoscopic surgery. The median operation time was 150 min, with an interquartile range (IQR) of 120 to 200 min for the robot-assisted group and 140 min with an IQR of 105 to 180 min in the laparoscopic group (P = 0.318). Despite four cases in the laparoscopic group (21%) being converted to laparotomy because of intraoperative bleeding, compared with none in the robot-assisted group, there was no significant difference between two groups (P = 0.128). The intraoperative volume of blood loss was significantly less (P = 0.041), and the hospitalization expense was significantly higher (P = 0.000) in the robot-assisted group than for the laparoscopic group. There was no significant difference in patients' age, tumor size, postoperative feeding time, and the postoperative hospitalization time between two groups (P > 0.05).
Conclusion: Robot-assisted benign splenic tumor resection was safe and feasible, and it reduced surgical trauma for the pediatric patient.
Keywords: Benign splenic tumor; Pediatric; Robot-assisted; Surgery.
© 2023. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no competing interests.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Robot-assisted resection of choledochal cyst in children.Front Pediatr. 2023 Jun 19;11:1162236. doi: 10.3389/fped.2023.1162236. eCollection 2023. Front Pediatr. 2023. PMID: 37404555 Free PMC article.
-
[Efficacy comparison between robot-assisted and laparoscopic surgery for mid-low rectal cancer: a prospective randomized controlled trial].Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Apr 25;23(4):377-383. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn.441530-20190401-00135. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2020. PMID: 32306606 Clinical Trial. Chinese.
-
Robot-Assisted Resection of Intestinal Duplication in Children.J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2022 Dec;32(12):1288-1292. doi: 10.1089/lap.2022.0173. Epub 2022 Jul 29. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2022. PMID: 35904972
-
Improved perioperative outcomes and reduced inflammatory stress response in malignant robot-assisted colorectal resections: a retrospective cohort study of 298 patients.World J Surg Oncol. 2021 May 22;19(1):155. doi: 10.1186/s12957-021-02263-w. World J Surg Oncol. 2021. PMID: 34022914 Free PMC article.
-
[Grading evaluation of operative complications and analysis of related risk factors in patients with stage Ⅰ endometrial cancer treated by robotic-assisted and traditional laparoscopic surgery].Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Feb 25;55(2):112-119. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-567X.2020.02.010. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2020. PMID: 32146740 Chinese.
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources