Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Dec 27;87(1):19.
doi: 10.1007/s00248-023-02329-0.

Insights into Endophytic and Rhizospheric Bacteria of Five Sugar Beet Hybrids in Terms of Their Diversity, Plant-Growth Promoting, and Biocontrol Properties

Affiliations

Insights into Endophytic and Rhizospheric Bacteria of Five Sugar Beet Hybrids in Terms of Their Diversity, Plant-Growth Promoting, and Biocontrol Properties

Marija Petrović et al. Microb Ecol. .

Abstract

Sugar beet is the most important crop for sugar production in temperate zones. The plant microbiome is considered an important factor in crop productivity and health. Here, we investigated the bacterial diversity of seeds, roots, and rhizosphere of five sugar beet hybrids named Eduarda (ED), Koala (KO), Tibor (T), Tajfun (TF), and Cercospora-resistant (C). A culture-independent next-generation sequencing approach was used for the further investigation of seed-borne endophytes. Hybrid-associated bacteria were evaluated for their plant growth-promoting (PGP) characteristics, antagonistic activity towards Cercospora beticola and several Fusarium strains in dual culture assays, and drought and salinity tolerance. High-throughput sequencing revealed that the Proteobacteria phylum was most dominant in the seeds of all hybrids, followed by Cyanobacteria and Actinobacteriota. The predominant genus in all hybrids was Pantoea, followed by Pseudomonas, Acinetobacter, Chalicogloea, Corynebacterium, Enterobacter, Enterococcus, Glutamicibacter, Kosakonia, and Marinilactibacillus. Unique genera in the hybrids were Pleurocapsa and Arthrobacter (T), Klebsiella (TF), Apibacter (ED), and Alloscardovia (KO). The genera that were most represented in one hybrid were Weissella and Staphylococcus (TF); Streptococcus (T); Gardnerella, Prevotella, and Rothia (KO); and Gilliamella, Lactobacillus, and Snodgrassella (ED). Thirty-two bacteria out of 156 isolates from the rhizosphere, roots, and seeds were selected with respect to various plant growth-promoting activities in vitro, i.e., nitrogen fixation, phosphate solubilization, siderophore production, indole-3-acetic acid production, 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid deaminase activity, hydrogen cyanide production, exoenzymatic activity (amylase, protease, lipase, cellulase, xylanase, mannanases, gelatinase, and pectinase), mitigation of environmental stresses, and antifungal activity. Mixta theicola KO3-44, Providencia vermicola ED3-10, Curtobacterium pusillum ED2-6, and Bacillus subtilis KO3-18 had the highest potential to promote plant growth due to their multiple abilities (nitrogen fixation, phosphate solubilization, production of siderophores, and IAA). The best antagonistic activity towards phytopathogenic fungi was found for Bacillus velezensis C3-19, Paenibacillus polymyxa C3-36 and Bacillus halotolerans C3-16/2.1. Only four isolates B. velezensis T2-23, B. subtilis T3-4, B. velezensis ED2-2, and Bacillus halotolerans C3-16/2.1 all showed enzymatic activity, with the exception of xylanase production. B. halotolerans C3-16/2.1 exhibited the greatest tolerance to salinity, while two B. subtilis strains (C3-62 and TF2-1) grew successfully at the maximum concentration of PEG. The current study demonstrates that sugar beet-associated bacteria have a wide range of beneficial traits and are therefore highly promising for the formulation of biological control and PGP agents.

Keywords: Biotic and abiotic stresses; Cercospora-resistant hybrid; Keystone species; Plant-associated bacteria; Sugar beet hybrids.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Venn diagram showing the common and unique distribution of culturable bacterial species in the rhizosphere, roots, and seeds among five different sugar beet hybrids
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
The alpha diversity in the five hybrids Tajfun (TF), Eduarda (ED), Koala (KO), Tibor (T), and Cercospora-resistant (C) was compared at all tax-level using Kruskal–Wallis one-way analysis of variance, while a Dunn post hoc test was run for pairwise group comparison. The values marked with the same letter within the diagram columns do not indicate statistically significant differences
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Beta diversity among five sugar beet hybrids Tajfun (TF), Eduarda (ED), Koala (KO), Tibor (T), and Cercospora-resistant (C) presented by DPCoA at the ASV and genus levels
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Relative abundance of bacterial phylum and genera associated with seeds from five sugar beet hybrids Tajfun (TF), Eduarda (ED), Koala (KO), Tibor (T), and Cercospora-resistant (C)
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Heatmap of relative abundance of bacterial ASVs associated with the with seeds from five sugar beet hybrids Tajfun (TF), Eduarda (ED), Koala (C), Tibor (T), and Cercospora-resistant (C)
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Differential abundance analysis of significantly more abundant taxa among in the seeds of five sugar beet hybrids Tajfun (TF), Eduarda (ED), Koala (KO), Tibor (T), and Cercospora-resistant (C). Bonferroni method was used for p-adjustment, and values of p < 0.01 were considered to be statistically significant

References

    1. Vandenkoornhuyse P, Quaiser A, Duhamel M, et al. The importance of the microbiome of the plant holobiont. New Phytol. 2015;206:1196–1206. doi: 10.1111/NPH.13312. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Berg G, Rybakova D, Grube M, Köberl M. The plant microbiome explored: implications for experimental botany. J Exp Bot. 2016;67:995–1002. doi: 10.1093/JXB/ERV466. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Compant S, Samad A, Faist H, Sessitsch A. A review on the plant microbiome: ecology, functions, and emerging trends in microbial application. J Adv Res. 2019;19:29–37. doi: 10.1016/j.jare.2019.03.004. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gupta R, Anand G, Gaur R, Yadav D. Plant–microbiome interactions for sustainable agriculture: a review. Physiol Mol Biol Plants. 2021;27:165–179. doi: 10.1007/S12298-021-00927-1/FIGURES/4. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Santoyo G. How plants recruit their microbiome? New insights into beneficial interactions. J Adv Res. 2022;40:45–58. doi: 10.1016/J.JARE.2021.11.020. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Supplementary concepts