Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Dec 12:10:1323465.
doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1323465. eCollection 2023.

Modern management of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm

Affiliations
Review

Modern management of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm

Salvatore T Scali et al. Front Cardiovasc Med. .

Abstract

Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (rAAA) remain one of the most clinically challenging and technically complex emergencies in contemporary vascular surgery practice. Over the past 30 years, a variety of changes surrounding the treatment of rAAA have evolved including improvements in diagnosis, development of coordinated referral networks to transfer patients more efficiently to higher volume centers, deliberate de-escalation of pre-hospital resuscitation, modification of patient and procedure selection, implementation of clinical pathways, as well as enhanced awareness of certain high-impact postoperative complications. Despite these advances, current postoperative outcomes remain sobering since morbidity and mortality rates ranging from 25%-50% persist among modern published series. Some of the most impactful variation in rAAA management has been fostered by the rapid proliferation of endovascular repair (EVAR) along with service alignment at selected centers to improve timely revascularization. Indeed, clinical care pathways and emergency response networks are now increasingly utilized which has led to improved outcomes contemporaneously. Moreover, evolution in pre- and post-operative physiologic resuscitation has also contributed to observed improvements in rAAA outcomes. Due to different developments in care provision over time, the purpose of this review is to describe the modern management of rAAA, while providing historical perspectives on patient, procedure and systems-based practice elements that have evolved care delivery paradigms in this complex group of patients.

Keywords: AAA; centralization; complications; management; rupture.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Updated AAA diameter associated annualized rupture risk estimates.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Ruptured AAA management algorithm.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Preoperative and intraoperative imaging for a ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Components of a REBOA kit.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Intraoperative imaging during ruptured endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Endovascular ruptured AAA repair kit.

References

    1. Green SY, Safi HJ, Coselli JS. A history of open thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair: perspective from Houston. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). (2021) 62:191–202. 10.23736/S0021-9509.21.11776-8 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ellis H. The first ligation of the abdominal aorta. J Perioper Pract. (2008) 18:255. 10.1177/175045890801800605 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bobadilla JL. From ebers to evars: a historical perspective on aortic surgery. Aorta (Stamford). (2013) 1:89–95. 10.12945/j.aorta.2013.13-004 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Troisi N, Bertagna G, Torri L, Canovaro F, D'Oria M, Adami D, et al. The management of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms: an ongoing challenge. J Clin Med. (2023) 12:1–8. 10.3390/jcm12175530 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ashton HA, Buxton MJ, Day NE, Kim LG, Marteau TM, Scott RA, et al. The multicentre aneurysm screening study (mass) into the effect of abdominal aortic aneurysm screening on mortality in men: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. (2002) 360:1531–9. 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)11522-4 - DOI - PubMed