Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Dec 11:10:1305868.
doi: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1305868. eCollection 2023.

Behavioral observations, heart rate and heart rate variability in horses following oral administration of a cannabidiol containing paste in three escalating doses (part 1/2)

Affiliations

Behavioral observations, heart rate and heart rate variability in horses following oral administration of a cannabidiol containing paste in three escalating doses (part 1/2)

Fabienne Eichler et al. Front Vet Sci. .

Abstract

Cannabidiol (CBD) products have been proposed to exert stress- and anxiety-relieving effects in animals. Despite the increasing popularity of CBD for veterinary use, the available research detailing the effects of CBD in horses is limited. The aim of this study (part 1 of 2) was to analyze stress parameters via behavioral observations and heart rate monitoring in healthy horses following single oral administration of a CBD containing paste in different doses. Study products were two pastes for oral administration, one containing CBD and one containing no active ingredient. Pastes were applied as single administrations in consecutive trials with escalating dosages (doses: 0.2, 1.0, 3.0 mg CBD/kg) to a treatment (trial 1: n = 3, trial 2: n = 3, trial 3: n = 5 horses) and a control group (trial 1: n = 3, trial 2: n = 3, trial 3: n = 6 horses) with minimum wash-out periods of seven days in between. Behavioral parameters were evaluated using video recordings to score the levels of sedation including the horses' reactions to acoustic and visual stimuli. Facial expression was assessed using photographs. Evaluation was based on the previously described facial sedation scale for horses (FaceSed) and the Horse Grimace Scale. For baseline values, identical observations were recorded on the day before each paste administration. Both paste administration and behavioral evaluation were performed double blinded. Cardiac beat-to-beat (R-R) intervals were continuously recorded throughout the trial and assessed using heart rate and heart rate variability parameters. Statistical analysis included comparison between treatment and control group over escalating doses and time points using linear mixed models. The CBD paste was well tolerated, and no side effects were observed. Analysis of sedation scores and facial expressions did not indicate significant differences between treatment and control group over the escalating doses. The heart rate was neither reduced, nor were significant changes in heart rate variability observed compared to the control group. Main limitation of this study is the small sample size. Further research is required to determine adequate doses and indications for the use of CBD products in horses.

Keywords: CBD; FaceSed; Horse Grimace Scale; behavior; equine; sedation score.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. This study received funding from Herosan healthcare GmbH. The funder was not involved in the study design, collection, analysis, interpretation of data, the writing of this article or the decision to submit it for publication. All authors declare to have full control over the data and no other competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Timeline showing interventions for each cannabidiol (CBD) oral medication trial. Upper panel, day before trial start. Lower panel, trial day. Trials were repeated three times with single administration of escalating CBD doses (0.2 mg CBD/kg BW; 1 mg CBD/kg BW; 3 mg CBD/kg BW) and wash-out periods of minimum seven days in between trials.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Summed up sedation scores after acoustic and visual stimulations (clicker, plastic bag, pink cloth) following single oral administration of cannabidiol (CBD) paste in escalating doses (A: 0.2 mg CBD/kg; B: 1 mg CBD/kg; C: 3 mg CBD/kg) - comparison between values obtained on baseline and trial day for the treatment and control group. Higher scale points relate to a higher level of sedation (Table 1). No significant differences were found between treatment and control group over all three trials.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Facial expression scale following single oral administration of cannabidiol (CBD) paste in escalating doses (A: 0.2 mg CBD/kg; B: 1 mg CBD/kg; C: 3 mg CBD/kg) - comparison between values obtained on baseline and trial day for the treatment and control group. Higher scale points relate to a higher level of sedation (Table 2).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Heart rates [beats per minute (bpm)] following single oral administration of cannabidiol (CBD) in three escalating doses (0.2 mg CBD/kg BW; 1 mg CBD/kg BW; 3 mg CBD/kg BW) at time point 0, displayed in 15-min sections over 12 h. Due to technical issues, the trial 1 R-R-interval data are partly incomplete.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Root mean square of successive R-R interval differences (RMSSD) in milliseconds (ms) following single oral administration of cannabidiol (CBD) in three escalating doses (0.2 mg CBD/kg BW; 1 mg CBD/kg BW; 3 mg CBD/kg BW) at time point 0, displayed in 15-min sections over 12 h. Due to technical issues, the trial 1 R-R-interval data are partly incomplete.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Normal-to-normal R-R intervals (SDNN) in milliseconds (ms) following single oral administration of cannabidiol (CBD) in three escalating doses (0.2 mg CBD/kg BW; 1 mg CBD/kg BW; 3 mg CBD/kg BW) at time point 0, displayed in 15-min sections over 12 h. Due to technical issues, the trial 1 R-R-interval data are partly incomplete.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Corsetti S, Borruso S, Malandrucco L, Spallucci V, Maragliano L, Perino R, et al. Cannabis sativa L. may reduce aggressive behaviour towards humans in shelter dogs. Sci Rep. (2021) 11:2773. 10.1038/s41598-021-82439-2 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Casajuana Köguel C, López-Pelayo H, Balcells-Olivero MM, Colom J, Gual A. Constituyentes psicoactivos del cannabis y sus implicaciones clínicas: una revisión sistemática. Adicciones. (2018) 30:140–51. 10.20882/adicciones.858 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Potschka H, Bhatti SF, Tipold A, McGrath S. Cannabidiol in canine epilepsy. Vet J. (2022) 12:105913. 10.1016/j.tvjl.2022.105913 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Corsato Alvarenga I, Panickar KS, Hess H, McGrath S. Scientific validation of cannabidiol for management of dog and cat diseases. Annu Rev Anim Biosci. (2023) 11:227–46. 10.1146/annurev-animal-081122-070236 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Miranda-Cortés A, Mota-Rojas D, Crosignani-Outeda N, Casas-Alvarado A, Martínez-Burnes J, Olmos-Hernández A, et al. The role of cannabinoids in pain modulation in companion animals. Front Vet Sci. (2022) 9:1050884. 10.3389/fvets.2022.1050884 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources