Comparison of surgical site infection (SSI) between negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) assisted delayed primary closure and conventional delayed primary closure in grossly contaminated emergency abdominal surgeries: a randomized controlled trial
- PMID: 38150073
- DOI: 10.1007/s00423-023-03202-x
Comparison of surgical site infection (SSI) between negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) assisted delayed primary closure and conventional delayed primary closure in grossly contaminated emergency abdominal surgeries: a randomized controlled trial
Abstract
Purpose: NPWT has been tried in many surgical fields, including colorectal, thoracic, vascular, and non-healing wounds, for the prevention of SSI. However, its efficacy in the prevention of SSI-grade IV closed abdominal wounds is yet to be explored.
Methods: All patients with grade IV abdominal wounds were included in the study. They were randomized into the conventional arm and the VAC arm after confirming the diagnosis intra-operatively. The sheath was closed, and the skin was laid open in the postoperative period. In the VAC arm, the NPWT dressing was applied on postoperative day (POD)-1 and removed on POD-5. In the conventional arm, only regular dressing was done postoperatively. The skin was closed with a delayed primary intention on POD-5 in both arms. The sutures were removed after 7 to 10 days of skin closure.
Results: The rate of SSI (10% in the VAC arm vs. 37.5% in the conventional arm, p-value = 0.004) was significantly lower in the VAC arm, as were the rates of seroma formation (2.4% in the VAC arm vs. 20% in the conventional arm, p = 0.014) and wound dehiscence (7.3% vs. 30%, p = 0.011). The conventional arm had a significant delay in skin closure beyond POD5 due to an increased rate of SSI, which also led to a prolonged hospital stay (5 days in the VAC arm vs. 6.5 days in the conventional arm, p-value = 0.005).
Conclusion: The VAC dressing can be used routinely in grade IV closed abdominal wounds to reduce the risk of SSI and wound dehiscence.
Keywords: Delayed primary closure; Dirty wound; NPWT; SSI.
© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
References
-
- World Health Organization (2018) Global guidelines for the prevention of surgical site infection, 2nd edn. Geneva, Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO
-
- Asaad AM, Badr SA (2016) Surgical site infections in developing countries: current burden and future challenges. Clin Microbiol 5:e136 https://doi.org/10.4172/2327-5073.1000e136
-
- Mukagendaneza MJ, Munyaneza E, Muhawenayo E, Nyirasebura D, Abahuje E, Nyirigira J et al (2019) Incidence, root causes, and outcomes of surgical site infections in a tertiary care hospital in Rwanda: a prospective observational cohort study. Patient Saf Surg 13(1):4–11 - DOI
-
- Singh M, Agarwal R, Singh R (2020) A prospective study on pattern of superficial surgical site infections in patients undergoing emergency laparotomy for perforation peritonitis. Int Surg J 7(6):1893 - DOI
-
- Thombare D, Joshi D (2019) A study of incidence and risk factors in post-operative abdominal wound infection in tertiary care centre. MVP J Med Sci 6(1):8–14 - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources