Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Dec 27;17(12):e0011863.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0011863. eCollection 2023 Dec.

Dynamics of chikungunya virus transmission in the first year after its introduction in Brazil: A cohort study in an urban community

Affiliations

Dynamics of chikungunya virus transmission in the first year after its introduction in Brazil: A cohort study in an urban community

Rosângela O Anjos et al. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. .

Abstract

Background: The first chikungunya virus (CHIKV) outbreaks during the modern scientific era were identified in the Americas in 2013, reaching high attack rates in Caribbean countries. However, few cohort studies have been performed to characterize the initial dynamics of CHIKV transmission in the New World.

Methodology/principal findings: To describe the dynamics of CHIKV transmission shortly after its introduction in Brazil, we performed semi-annual serosurveys in a long-term community-based cohort of 652 participants aged ≥5 years in Salvador, Brazil, between Feb-Apr/2014 and Nov/2016-Feb/2017. CHIKV infections were detected using an IgG ELISA. Cumulative seroprevalence and seroincidence were estimated and spatial aggregation of cases was investigated. The first CHIKV infections were identified between Feb-Apr/2015 and Aug-Nov/2015 (incidence: 10.7%) and continued to be detected at low incidence in subsequent surveys (1.7% from Aug-Nov/2015 to Mar-May/2016 and 1.2% from Mar-May/2016 to Nov/206-Feb/2017). The cumulative seroprevalence in the last survey reached 13.3%. It was higher among those aged 30-44 and 45-59 years (16.1% and 15.6%, respectively), compared to younger (12.4% and 11.7% in <15 and 15-29 years, respectively) or older (10.3% in ≥60 years) age groups, but the differences were not statistically significant. The cumulative seroprevalence was similar between men (14.7%) and women (12.5%). Yet, among those aged 15-29 years, men were more often infected than women (18.1% vs. 7.4%, respectively, P = 0.01), while for those aged 30-44, a non-significant opposite trend was observed (9.3% vs. 19.0%, respectively, P = 0.12). Three spatial clusters of cases were detected in the study site and an increased likelihood of CHIKV infection was detected among participants who resided with someone with CHIKV IgG antibodies.

Conclusions/significance: Unlike observations in other settings, the initial spread of CHIKV in this large urban center was limited and focal in certain areas, leaving a high proportion of the population susceptible to further outbreaks. Additional investigations are needed to elucidate the factors driving CHIKV spread dynamics, including understanding differences with respect to dengue and Zika viruses, in order to guide prevention and control strategies for coping with future outbreaks.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

I have read the journal’s policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: A.I.K is an expert panel member for Reckitt Global Hygiene Institute and a scientific advisory committee member for Merck-related arboviral research but outside the scope of the manuscript. S.C.W. holds patents for alphavirus vaccine development. Other authors declare no conflict of interest

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
A) Time series of reported cases suspected of chikungunya (laboratory or clinical-epidemiological diagnosis) in Salvador and the Community of Pau da Lima between 2014–2017 (data provided by the Municipal Health Department). B) Incidence and prevalence of CHIKV infection among the cohort participants in Pau da Lima, Salvador, Brazil, 2015–2017. C) Location of Salvador in Brazil and spatial distribution of households of cohort participants in the Pau da Lima study site according to the participant’s CHIKV infection status during follow-up. Clusters of statistically significant cases are shown by the three dashed orange circles. Note: Incidence was defined based on CHIKV IgG seroconversion between consecutive surveys and prevalence by the cumulative proportion of participants with CHIKV IgG antibodies in each survey. Two subjects who were CHIKV IgG-positive before 2015 were excluded from the study due to suspected CHIKV IgG cross-reactivity. CHIKV IgG immune status was input to 28 participants who were positive in the last survey and did not have serum samples available from previous surveys to test. Source Link to South America map: https://public.opendatasoft.com/explore/dataset/world-administrative-boundaries/export/. Terms of use/license information: https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3/. Source Link to Brazil map and terms of use/license information: https://www.ibge.gov.br/geociencias/organizacao-do-territorio/malhas-territoriais/15774-malhas.html. Source Link to orthoimage from Salvador: http://mapeamento.salvador.ba.gov.br/. Terms of use / license information: http://cartografia.salvador.ba.gov.br/index.php/dados-geoespaciais/baixar-dados-geoespaciais/orientacoes.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Incidence and prevalence of CHIKV infection, according to age and sex, Salvador, Brazil, 2015–2017.
Note: Incidence was determined by CHIKV IgG seroconversions between A) Feb-Apr/2015 and Aug-Nov/2015, B) Aug-Nov/2015 and Mar-May/2016, and C) Mar-May/2016 and Nov/2016-Feb/2017. Prevalence was determined by detecting CHIKV IgG in D) Aug-Nov/2016, E) Mar-May/2016, and F) Nov/2016-Feb/2017. CHIKV IgG immune status was input to 28 participants who were positive in the last survey and did not have serum samples available from previous surveys to test.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Weaver SC, Lecuit M. Chikungunya virus and the global spread of a mosquito-borne disease. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(13):1231–9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1406035 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Teixeira MG, Andrade AMS, Costa M da CN, Castro JSM, Oliveira FLS, Goes CSB, et al.. East/Central/South African Genotype Chikungunya Virus, Brazil, 2014. Emerg Infect Dis. 2015. May;21(5):906–7. doi: 10.3201/eid2105.141727 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nunes MRT, Faria NR, de Vasconcelos JM, Golding N, Kraemer MU, de Oliveira LF, et al.. Emergence and potential for spread of Chikungunya virus in Brazil. BMC Med. 2015. Apr 30;13:102. doi: 10.1186/s12916-015-0348-x - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ministério da Saúde (BR). Monitoramento dos casos de dengue, febre de chikungunya e febre pelo vírus Zika até a Semana Epidemiológica 52, 2015. Vol. 47. Available from: http://scf.cpqam.fiocruz.br/merg/index.php/publicacoes/18-informes-e-bol...
    1. Fernández-Salas I, Díaz-González EE, López-Gatell H, Alpuche-Aranda C. Chikugunya and zika virus dissemination in the Americas. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2016. Oct;29(5):467–75. doi: 10.1097/QCO.0000000000000304 - DOI - PubMed