Comparison of the Efficacy of HSK3486 and Propofol for Induction of General Anesthesia in Adults: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Controlled, Phase 3 Noninferiority Trial
- PMID: 38150544
- DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000004886
Comparison of the Efficacy of HSK3486 and Propofol for Induction of General Anesthesia in Adults: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Controlled, Phase 3 Noninferiority Trial
Abstract
Background: Propofol is an intravenous anesthetic associated with hypotension, respiratory depression, and injection-site pain. HSK3486 injectable emulsion (ciprofol) is a 2,6-disubstituted phenol derivative with fast onset and quick, stable recovery. Previous studies support HSK3486 as an effective, safe anesthetic with substantially less injection-site pain than propofol. The primary objective of this study was to investigate the noninferiority of HSK3486 compared with propofol in successful general anesthesia induction.
Methods: Two hundred fifty-five participants were enrolled in HSK3486-304, a multicenter, randomized (2:1), double-blind, propofol-controlled, phase 3 study evaluating HSK3486 for general anesthesia induction in adults undergoing elective surgery with tracheal intubation. The primary endpoint was successful anesthesia induction, defined as 1 or less on the Modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation scale. Key secondary endpoints were proportion of participants with injection-site pain on the Numerical Rating Scale of 1 or greater and a composite endpoint, including the proportion of participants successfully induced while maintaining the desired anesthetic depth and without substantial cardiac and respiratory events. Safety endpoints included adverse events, abnormal vital signs, and injection-site pain.
Results: Two hundred fifty-one participants (HSK3486, n = 168; propofol, n = 83) were included in the analyses. General anesthesia was successfully induced in 97.0% versus 97.6% of participants with HSK3486 and propofol, respectively. The difference in success rate was -0.57% (95% CI, -5.4 to 4.2%); the noninferiority boundary of -8% was not crossed. Thirty participants (18.0%) had injection-site pain with HSK3486 versus 64 (77.1%) with propofol (P < 0.0001). Eighty-one participants (48.2%) with HSK3486 versus 42 (50.6%) with propofol (P = 0.8780) satisfied the composite endpoint. When injection-site pain was excluded, the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events related to study drug was 17.9% for HSK3486 and 14.5% for propofol.
Conclusions: The study met its primary objective and endpoint, demonstrating noninferiority of HSK3486 compared with propofol in successful anesthetic induction. Substantially less injection-site pain was associated with HSK3486 than with propofol.
Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc., on behalf of the American Society of Anesthesiologists.
Similar articles
-
Efficacy and safety of ciprofol vs. propofol for the induction and maintenance of general anaesthesia: A multicentre, single-blind, randomised, parallel-group, phase 3 clinical trial.Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2023 Jun 1;40(6):399-406. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000001799. Epub 2023 Jan 19. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2023. PMID: 36647565 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Efficacy and safety of HSK3486 for the induction and maintenance of general anesthesia in elective surgical patients: a multicenter, randomized, open-label, propofol-controlled phase 2 clinical trial.Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2022 Feb;26(4):1114-1124. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202202_28101. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2022. PMID: 35253166 Clinical Trial.
-
Bispectral Index-Monitored Anesthesia Induction in Older Adults Undergoing Elective Surgery: Comparing Ciprofol and Propofol in a Prospective, Single-Center, Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Study.Drug Des Devel Ther. 2024 Nov 5;18:4993-5003. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S484532. eCollection 2024. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2024. PMID: 39525043 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Efficacy and safety of Ciprofol compared with Propofol during general anesthesia induction: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCT).J Clin Anesth. 2024 Jun;94:111425. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111425. Epub 2024 Feb 26. J Clin Anesth. 2024. PMID: 38412619
-
A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the efficacy and safety of ciprofol (HSK3486) versus propofol for anesthetic induction and non-ICU sedation.Front Pharmacol. 2023 Sep 25;14:1225288. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1225288. eCollection 2023. Front Pharmacol. 2023. PMID: 37818194 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Efficacy and safety of ciprofol versus propofol for induction of general anaesthesia or sedation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.Indian J Anaesth. 2024 Sep;68(9):776-794. doi: 10.4103/ija.ija_104_24. Epub 2024 Aug 16. Indian J Anaesth. 2024. PMID: 39386394 Free PMC article.
-
Effective dose of ciprofol combined with low-dose sufentanil for sedation of gastroscopy: a dose-finding study using a biased coin design.BMC Anesthesiol. 2025 Mar 14;25(1):124. doi: 10.1186/s12871-025-02986-3. BMC Anesthesiol. 2025. PMID: 40087568 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
The potency-ratio of ciprofol and propofol under procedural sedation and anesthesia for outpatient hysteroscopy during cervical dilation: a study using up-and-down sequential allocation method.BMC Anesthesiol. 2024 Nov 26;24(1):426. doi: 10.1186/s12871-024-02793-2. BMC Anesthesiol. 2024. PMID: 39592954 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Effect of ciprofol compared with propofol on hemodynamics in bronchoscope procedures during anesthetic induction: a randomized double-blind controlled study.Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 May 16;12:1545736. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1545736. eCollection 2025. Front Med (Lausanne). 2025. PMID: 40454155 Free PMC article.
-
The efficacy and safety of remimazolam besylate, ciprofol, and propofol during hysteroscopy.Front Pharmacol. 2025 Jan 8;15:1427755. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1427755. eCollection 2024. Front Pharmacol. 2025. PMID: 39845790 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous