Biological sex does not influence the peak cardiac output response to twelve weeks of sprint interval training
- PMID: 38151488
- PMCID: PMC10752867
- DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-50016-4
Biological sex does not influence the peak cardiac output response to twelve weeks of sprint interval training
Abstract
Sprint interval training (SIT) increases peak oxygen uptake (V̇O2peak) but the mechanistic basis is unclear. We have reported that 12 wk of SIT increased V̇O2peak and peak cardiac output (Q̇peak) and the changes in these variables were correlated. An exploratory analysis suggested that Q̇peak increased in males but not females. The present study incorporated best practices to examine the potential influence of biological sex on the Q̇peak response to SIT. Male and female participants (n = 10 each; 21 ± 4 y) performed 33 ± 2 sessions of SIT over 12 wk. Each 10-min session involved 3 × 20-s 'all-out' sprints on an ergometer. V̇O2peak increased after SIT (3.16 ± 1.0 vs. 2.89 ± 1.0 L/min, η2p = 0.53, p < 0.001) with no sex × time interaction (p = 0.61). Q̇peak was unchanged after training (15.2 ± 3.3 vs. 15.1 ± 3.0 L/min, p = 0.85), in contrast to our previous study. The peak estimated arteriovenous oxygen difference increased after training (204 ± 30 vs. 187 ± 36 ml/L, p = 0.006). There was no effect of training or sex on measures of endothelial function. We conclude that 12 wk of SIT increases V̇O2peak but the mechanistic basis remains unclear. The capacity of inert gas rebreathing to assess changes in Q̇peak may be limited and invasive studies that use more direct measures are needed.
© 2023. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no competing interests.
Figures





Similar articles
-
Twelve weeks of sprint interval training increases peak cardiac output in previously untrained individuals.Eur J Appl Physiol. 2021 Sep;121(9):2449-2458. doi: 10.1007/s00421-021-04714-4. Epub 2021 May 20. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2021. PMID: 34014402
-
Submaximal exercise cardiac output is increased by 4 weeks of sprint interval training in young healthy males with low initial Q̇-V̇O2: Importance of cardiac response phenotype.PLoS One. 2019 Jan 23;14(1):e0195458. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195458. eCollection 2019. PLoS One. 2019. PMID: 30673702 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Sprint exercise snacks: a novel approach to increase aerobic fitness.Eur J Appl Physiol. 2019 May;119(5):1203-1212. doi: 10.1007/s00421-019-04110-z. Epub 2019 Mar 7. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2019. PMID: 30847639 Clinical Trial.
-
Effect of High-Intensity Interval Training Versus Sprint Interval Training on Time-Trial Performance: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Sports Med. 2020 Jun;50(6):1145-1161. doi: 10.1007/s40279-020-01264-1. Sports Med. 2020. PMID: 32034701
-
Effect of Interval Training on the Factors Influencing Maximal Oxygen Consumption: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Sports Med. 2022 Jun;52(6):1329-1352. doi: 10.1007/s40279-021-01624-5. Epub 2022 Jan 18. Sports Med. 2022. PMID: 35041180
Cited by
-
Arteries and Hearts in Motion: Sex Differences in Exercise-Mediated Protection Against Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Risk.Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2025 May 16;27(1):56. doi: 10.1007/s11883-025-01300-3. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2025. PMID: 40374914 Review.
References
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources