Abdominopelvic computerized tomography and open peritoneal lavage in patients with blunt abdominal trauma: a prospective study

Abstract

This prospective trial compares abdominopelvic computerized tomography and open peritoneal lavage in the diagnosis of blunt abdominal trauma. Fifteen patients (group 1) were evaluated by both methods. Another 15 patients (group 2) had only computerized tomography. Criteria for a "positive" scan were hemoperitoneum and evidence of solid organ injury. Criteria for "positive" lavage were a grossly bloody return, erythrocyte count greater than 20.0 X 10(9)/L and leukocyte count greater than 0.5 X 10(9)/L. At laparotomy, only injuries requiring repair or excision were considered "true positive". Patients who did not have laparotomy and had an uncomplicated clinical course were considered "true negative". With tomographic criteria alone for diagnosis there would have been one false-positive and three false-negative results, compared with three false positive and no false negatives for open peritoneal lavage alone. None of the three patients who had negative findings on laparotomy suffered any morbidity or died. Results of computerized tomography and open peritoneal lavage agreed in 8 of 15 patients (kappa value = 0.52), indicating a low level of agreement between the two. The authors believe that open peritoneal lavage remains the diagnostic procedure of choice in blunt abdominal trauma.