The important factors nurses consider when choosing shift patterns: A cross-sectional study
- PMID: 38151796
- DOI: 10.1111/jocn.16974
The important factors nurses consider when choosing shift patterns: A cross-sectional study
Abstract
Aim: To gain a deeper understanding of what is important to nurses when thinking about shift patterns and the organisation of working time.
Design: A cross-sectional survey of nursing staff working across the UK and Ireland collected quantitative and qualitative responses.
Methods: We recruited from two National Health Service Trusts and through an open call via trade union membership, online/print nursing profession magazines and social media. Worked versus preferred shift length/pattern, satisfaction and choice over shift patterns and nurses' views on aspects related to work and life (when working short, long, rotating shifts) were analysed with comparisons of proportions of agreement and crosstabulation. Qualitative responses on important factors related to shift preferences were analysed with inductive thematic analysis.
Results: Eight hundred and seventy-three survey responses were collected. When nurses worked long shifts and rotating shifts, lower proportions reported being satisfied with their shifts and working their preferred shift length and pattern. Limited advantages were realised when comparing different shift types; however, respondents more frequently associated 'low travel costs' and 'better ability to do paid overtime' with long shifts and 'healthy diet/exercise' with short shifts; aspects related to rotating shifts often had the lowest proportions of agreement. In the qualitative analysis, three themes were developed: 'When I want to work', 'Impacts to my life outside work' and 'Improving my work environment'. Reasons for nurses' shift preferences were frequently related to nurses' priorities outside of work, highlighting the importance of organising schedules that support a good work-life balance.
Relevance to clinical practice: General scheduling practices like adhering to existing shift work guidelines, using consistent and predictable shift patterns and facilitating flexibility over working time were identified by nurses as enablers for their preferences and priorities. These practices warrant meaningful consideration when establishing safe and efficient nurse rosters.
Patient or public contribution: This survey was developed and tested with a diverse group of stakeholders, including nursing staff, patients, union leads and ward managers.
Reporting method: The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies (STROBE) checklist for cross-sectional studies was used to guide reporting.
Keywords: flexible working; nursing; preferences; rostering; scheduling; shift work; working patterns.
© 2023 The Authors. Journal of Clinical Nursing published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Albertsen, K., Rafnsdóttir, G. L., Grimsmo, A., Tómasson, K., & Kauppinen, K. (2008). Workhours and worklife balance. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, 34(5), 14.
-
- Arlinghaus, A., Bohle, P., Iskra-Golec, I., Jansen, N., Jay, S., & Rotenberg, L. (2019). Working time society consensus statements: Evidence-based effects of shift work and non-standard working hours on workers, family and community. Industrial Health, 57(2), 184-200.
-
- Arlinghaus, A., & Nachreiner, F. (2016). Unusual and unsocial? Effects of shift work and other unusual working times on social participation. In I. Iskra-Golec, J. Barnes-Farell, & P. Bohle (Eds.), Social and family issues in shift work and non standard working hours (pp. 39-57). Springer.
-
- Atkinson, C., & Hall, L. (2011). Flexible working and happiness in the NHS. Employee Relations, 33(2), 88-105.
-
- Backhaus, N. (2022). Working time control and variability in Europe revisited: Correlations with health, sleep, and well-being. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(22), 14778.
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous