Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Feb 1;45(2):136-142.
doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000004083. Epub 2023 Dec 23.

Cochlear Implant Electrode Array Design and Speech Understanding

Varun Vohra  1 , Nicholas S Andresen  2 , Courtney Carver  2 , Rachel Dunham  2 , Dawn Marsiglia  2 , Jenifer Yeagle  2 , Charles C Della Santina  2 , Francis X Creighton Jr  2 , Stephen P Bowditch  2 , Daniel Q Sun  2
Affiliations

Cochlear Implant Electrode Array Design and Speech Understanding

Varun Vohra et al. Otol Neurotol. .

Abstract

Objective: Cochlear implant electrode arrays are categorized based on their design as lateral wall (LW) and perimodiolar (PM) electrode arrays. The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of LW versus PM designs on postoperative speech perception across multiple manufacturers and over long follow-up durations.

Design: Retrospective cohort study.

Setting: Single academic medical center.

Participants: A total of 478 adult cochlear implant recipients, implanted between the years 1992 and 2017.

Interventionss: PM versus LW cochlear implants.

Main outcomes and measures: Postoperative Consonant-Nucleus-Consonant Word (CNC-w) and Hearing in Noise Test (HINT) scores between 6 months and 5 years.

Results: Across 478 patients, approximately one-third received LW (n = 176, 36.8%), whereas 302 patients received a PM array (63.2%). The PM group had higher CNC-w scores from 6 months to 2 years (52 [interquartile range, 38-68] versus 48 [31-62], p = 0.036) and from 2 to 5 years (58 [43-72] versus 48 [33-66], p < 0.001). Multivariable analysis of patient-averaged scores indicated that the PM group had greater improvement from preoperative scores at all time points after the initial 6 months for both CNC-w ( β = 4.4 [95% confidence interval, 0.6-8.3], p = 0.023) and HINT testing ( β = 4.5 [95% confidence interval, 0.3-8.7], p = 0.038).

Conclusions: This study indicates that PM electrode arrays are associated with small increases in postoperative speech perception scores, relative to LW arrays, when assessed across manufacturers, over long time durations, and using multiple outcome instruments. These findings may help guide surgeon selection and patient counseling of cochlear implant arrays.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors disclose no conflicts of interest.

References

    1. Lin FR, Niparko JK, Ferrucci L. Hearing loss prevalence in the United States. Arch Intern Med 2011;171:1851–2.
    1. Moberly AC, Bates C, Harris MS, Pisoni DB. The enigma of poor performance by adults with cochlear implants. Otol Neurotol 2016;37:1522–8.
    1. Rebscher SJ, Hetherington A, Bonham B, et al. Considerations for design of future cochlear implant electrode arrays: electrode array stiffness, size, and depth of insertion. J Rehabil Res Dev 2008;45:731–48.
    1. McRackan TR, Hand BN, Velozo CA, Dubno JR. Association of demographic and hearing-related factors with cochlear implant–related quality of life. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2019;145:422–30.
    1. Holden LK, Finley CC, Firszt JB, et al. Factors affecting open-set word recognition in adults with cochlear implants. Ear Hear 2013;34:342–60.