Case report: Application of color Doppler sonography for the assessment of pulmonary consolidations in a dog
- PMID: 38152596
- PMCID: PMC10752369
- DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1275929
Case report: Application of color Doppler sonography for the assessment of pulmonary consolidations in a dog
Abstract
A 1,5-year-old male Maltipoo was presented to the emergency service for dyspnea, weakness, and cough. An echocardiographic examination showed evidence of pulmonary hypertension with a McConnell sign. Lung ultrasound, including color Doppler, was performed and identified two distinct populations of lung consolidation. Color Doppler analysis of the first type of consolidation showed the absence of blood flow within regions of the consolidation and flow amputation. These findings were consistent with the "vascular sign" reported in human medicine and prompted consideration of pulmonary thromboembolism as a differential diagnosis. In the second type of consolidation, color Doppler identified blood flow within the pulmonary vessels of the consolidated lung, forming a "branching tree-like" pattern that followed the anatomical course of the pulmonary vasculature. These findings suggested that blood flow was preserved within the pulmonary vasculature of the consolidated lung and prompted consideration of inflammatory causes of pulmonary pathology. On recheck 6 days later, recanalization of the first type of consolidation was identified with color Doppler. The case was followed serially once a month for 5 months with LUS, which showed continued improvement. Based on a positive fecal Baermann test, a final diagnosis of Angiostrongylus vasorum was made. New or Unique information Provided-this is the first report of color Doppler LUS being used to characterize and help differentiate the cause of lung consolidation in dogs.
Keywords: color Doppler; consolidation; dog; lung ultrasonography (LUS); thromboembolic disease.
Copyright © 2023 Kraszewska, Gajewski and Boysen.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.
Figures
References
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
