Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Feb 15:8:e52576.
doi: 10.2196/52576.

User Engagement, Acceptability, and Clinical Markers in a Digital Health Program for Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: Prospective, Single-Arm Feasibility Study

Affiliations

User Engagement, Acceptability, and Clinical Markers in a Digital Health Program for Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: Prospective, Single-Arm Feasibility Study

Sigridur Björnsdottir et al. JMIR Cardio. .

Abstract

Background: Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) has become the most common chronic liver disease in the world. Common comorbidities are central obesity, type 2 diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, and metabolic syndrome. Cardiovascular disease is the most common cause of death among people with NAFLD, and lifestyle changes can improve health outcomes.

Objective: This study aims to explore the acceptability of a digital health program in terms of engagement, retention, and user satisfaction in addition to exploring changes in clinical outcomes, such as weight, cardiometabolic risk factors, and health-related quality of life.

Methods: We conducted a prospective, open-label, single-arm, 12-week study including 38 individuals with either a BMI >30, metabolic syndrome, or type 2 diabetes mellitus and NAFLD screened by FibroScan. An NAFLD-specific digital health program focused on disease education, lowering carbohydrates in the diet, food logging, increasing activity level, reducing stress, and healthy lifestyle coaching was offered to participants. The coach provided weekly feedback on food logs and other in-app activities and opportunities for participants to ask questions. The coaching was active throughout the 12-week intervention period. The primary outcome was feasibility and acceptability of the 12-week program, assessed through patient engagement, retention, and satisfaction with the program. Secondary outcomes included changes in weight, liver fat, body composition, and other cardiometabolic clinical parameters at baseline and 12 weeks.

Results: In total, 38 individuals were included in the study (median age 59.5, IQR 46.3-68.8 years; n=23, 61% female). Overall, 34 (89%) participants completed the program and 29 (76%) were active during the 12-week program period. The median satisfaction score was 6.3 (IQR 5.8-6.7) of 7. Mean weight loss was 3.5 (SD 3.7) kg (P<.001) or 3.2% (SD 3.4%), with a 2.2 (SD 2.7) kg reduction in fat mass (P<.001). Relative liver fat reduction was 19.4% (SD 23.9%). Systolic blood pressure was reduced by 6.0 (SD 13.5) mmHg (P=.009). The median reduction was 0.14 (IQR 0-0.47) mmol/L for triglyceride levels (P=.003), 3.2 (IQR 0.0-5.4) µU/ml for serum insulin (s-insulin) levels (P=.003), and 0.5 (IQR -0.7 to 3.8) mmol/mol for hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels (P=.03). Participants who were highly engaged (ie, who used the app at least 5 days per week) had greater weight loss and liver fat reduction.

Conclusions: The 12-week-long digital health program was feasible for individuals with NAFLD, receiving high user engagement, retention, and satisfaction. Improved liver-specific and cardiometabolic health was observed, and more engaged participants showed greater improvements. This digital health program could provide a new tool to improve health outcomes in people with NAFLD.

Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT05426382; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05426382.

Keywords: BMI; NAFLD; acceptability; body composition; cardiology; cardiometabolic; cardiometabolic health; cardiovascular; chronic; coach; coaching; diabetes; diabetic; diabetics; diet; dietary; digital health; digital health program; digital therapeutics; exercise; fat; feasibility; hepatic; lifestyle; liver; metabolic syndrome; nonalcoholic fatty liver disease; nutrition; nutritional; patient education; physical activity; type 2; weight.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: HU, EFG, AI, BD, KS, TK, GEAM, and TG are employed by Sidekick Health. SO is an employee and cofounder of Sidekick Health. SB received consultancy fees from Sidekick Health during the study period. SS, GB, and VG have no competing interests to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Example screens of the Sidekick app and the Sidekick-241 NAFLD program user interface. NAFLD: nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Flowchart of study participants. MRI: magnetic resonance imaging; SK: Sidekick.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Rinella ME. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a systematic review. JAMA. 2015 Jun 09;313(22):2263–2273. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.5370.2319168 - DOI - PubMed
    1. European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD) European Association for the Study of Obesity (EASO) EASL-EASD-EASO Clinical Practice Guidelines for the management of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. J Hepatol. 2016 Jun;64(6):1388–1402. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2015.11.004.S0168-8278(15)00734-5 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Budd J, Cusi K. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: what does the primary care physician need to know? Am J Med. 2020 May;133(5):536–543. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2020.01.007.S0002-9343(20)30100-5 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Younossi ZM, Koenig AB, Abdelatif D, Fazel Y, Henry L, Wymer M. Global epidemiology of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease-Meta-analytic assessment of prevalence, incidence, and outcomes. Hepatology. 2016 Jul;64(1):73–84. doi: 10.1002/hep.28431. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Younossi ZM, Golabi P, de Avila L, Paik JM, Srishord M, Fukui N, Qiu Y, Burns L, Afendy A, Nader F. The global epidemiology of NAFLD and NASH in patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Hepatol. 2019 Oct;71(4):793–801. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2019.06.021.S0168-8278(19)30393-9 - DOI - PubMed

Associated data