Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2023 Dec 1;4(12):e234611.
doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2023.4611.

Financial Outcomes of Managed Entry Agreements for Pharmaceuticals in Italy

Affiliations
Observational Study

Financial Outcomes of Managed Entry Agreements for Pharmaceuticals in Italy

Francesco Trotta et al. JAMA Health Forum. .

Abstract

Importance: Most countries in the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development apply managed entry agreements (MEAs), reimbursement arrangements between manufacturers and payers, to pharmaceuticals. Few data exist regarding their ability to lower expenditures.

Objective: To analyze the financial outcomes of MEAs for pharmaceuticals from 2019 to 2021 in Italy.

Design, setting, and participants: In this observational study of MEAs and pharmaceutical spending in Italy, medications that were monitored through individually collected data and generated paybacks from manufacturers during the 2019 to 2021 study period were included in the analysis. Payback data were collected through pharmaceutical spending monitoring activities conducted by the Agenzia Italiana del Farmaco (Italian Medicines Agency). Expenditure data were collected through the Italian Drug Traceability System. Products were categorized by type of MEA: financial-based, outcome-based, or mixed.

Main outcomes and measures: The main outcome was median payback as a proportion of expenditure by category of MEA. Results were also provided by subtype: cost sharing or capping models for financial-based MEAs and risk-sharing or payment-by-result models for outcome-based MEAs. Mixed MEAs were considered when medications had multiple indications with different MEA types.

Results: A total of 73 medications with MEAs generated a payback by manufacturers during the study period. Six were either not reimbursable or delivered within the Italian National Health Service, and 5 had incomplete data. Of the 62 medications analyzed, 24 (38.7%) had financial-based MEAs, 30 (48.4%) had outcome-based MEAs, and 8 (12.9%) had mixed MEAs. A total payback amount of €327.5 million was calculated during the 3 years, corresponding to 0.9% of the €41.1 billion of total expenditures for medications purchased by public health facilities in Italy. Financial-based MEAs returned the highest payback revenues, €158.1 million; the outcome-based MEAs and mixed MEAs generated smaller paybacks of €74.5 million and €94.9 million, respectively. Overall, the median proportion of payback to expenditure on the medications analyzed was 3.8%. For mixed MEAs, the payback-to-expenditure proportion was 6.7%; for outcome-based MEAs, 3.3%; and for financial-based MEAs, 3.7%.

Conclusions and relevance: This observational study found limited evidence that MEAs lower pharmaceutical expenditures. Determining criteria for prioritizing MEA use, identifying potential design changes, and improving implementation may be needed in the future.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.

Figures

Figure.
Figure.. Distribution of Proportions of Payback Values to Total Expenditures by Category of Agreement and Subtype
In this box plot, the lines splitting the boxes represent the median payback shares as a proportion of expenditures. The lower edge of the box represents the lower quartiles of payback share values by category of agreement and subtype. The upper edge of the box represents the upper quartile. At the end of the whiskers, the minimum and maximum payback share values are represented by category and subtype. CS indicates cost sharing; MEA, managed entry agreement; PbR, payment by result; RS, risk sharing.

Comment in

References

    1. Wenzl M, Chapman S. Performance-based managed entry agreements for new medicines in OECD countries and EU member states: how they work and possible improvements going forward. OECD Health Working Papers. No. 115. OECD Publishing. 2019. Accessed November 15, 2023. https://www.oecd.org/els/health-systems/pharma-managed-entry-agreements.htm
    1. Gamba S, Pertile P, Vogler S. The impact of managed entry agreements on pharmaceutical prices. Health Econ. 2020;29(S1)(suppl 1):47-62. doi:10.1002/hec.4112 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Klemp M, Frønsdal KB, Facey K; HTAi Policy Forum . What principles should govern the use of managed entry agreements? Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2011;27(1):77-83. Published online January 25, 2011. doi:10.1017/S0266462310001297 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Carlson JJ, Sullivan SD, Garrison LP, Neumann PJ, Veenstra DL. Linking payment to health outcomes: a taxonomy and examination of performance-based reimbursement schemes between healthcare payers and manufacturers. Health Policy. 2010;96(3):179-190. doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2010.02.005 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Garrison LP Jr, Towse A, Briggs A, et al. . Performance-based risk-sharing arrangements—good practices for design, implementation, and evaluation: report of the ISPOR good practices for performance-based risk-sharing arrangements task force. Value Health. 2013;16(5):703-719. doi:10.1016/j.jval.2013.04.011 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Substances