'Naming and faming' maternity care providers: A mixed-methods study
- PMID: 38154428
- DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2023.103912
'Naming and faming' maternity care providers: A mixed-methods study
Abstract
Background: Positive benchmarking can serve as a catalyst for maternity care improvement.
Aim: To retrospectively benchmark Flemish maternity care providers' qualities, based on women's positive care experiences, and to explore which attributes of the different care providers contribute to these experiences.
Methods: A sequential, two-phased mixed-methods study benchmarking the qualities of the community midwife, the hospital midwife, and the obstetrician. An online questionnaire was used to collect the data among pregnant and postpartum women, who rated their care experiences with the various care providers using the Net Promoter Score. Non-parametric and post hoc tests established the differences between types of clinicians and between antenatal, intrapartum, and postpartum Net Promoter Score mean scores. Content analysis was used to construct a final pool of keywords representing attributes of care professionals, accumulated from the promoters' free text responses. Ranks were assigned to each keyword based on its frequency.
Findings: A total of 2385 Net Promoter Scale scores and 1856 free-text responses of 1587 responders were included. The community midwife received the overall highest NPS scores (p < .001). The promoters (n = 1015) assigned community midwives the highest NPS scores (9.67), followed by obstetricians (9.57) and hospital-based midwives (9.51). The distinct benchmarking attributes of community midwives were availability (p < .001), supportiveness (p = .04) and personalised care (p < .001). Being honest (p < .001), empathic (p < .001) and inexhaustible (p = .04) benchmarked hospital midwives. Calmness (p < .001), a no-nonsense approach (p < .001), being humane (p = .01) and comforting (p = .02) benchmarked obstetricians.
Discussion/conclusion: The findings indicate that all care providers are highly valued, but community midwives are ranked the highest. The distinct differences between the care professionals can serve as exemplary performance for professional development and shape the profiles of maternity care professionals.
Keywords: Benchmarking healthcare; Midwifery; Obstetricians; Patient experience; Personal satisfaction; Quality indicators healthcare.
Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Similar articles
-
Experiences of maternity care among women at increased risk of preterm birth receiving midwifery continuity of care compared to women receiving standard care: Results from the POPPIE pilot trial.PLoS One. 2021 Apr 21;16(4):e0248588. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248588. eCollection 2021. PLoS One. 2021. PMID: 33882059 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Women's, midwives' and obstetricians' experiences of a structured process to document refusal of recommended maternity care.Women Birth. 2016 Dec;29(6):531-541. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2016.05.005. Epub 2016 Jun 8. Women Birth. 2016. PMID: 27289330
-
Opinions of professionals about integrating midwife- and obstetrician-led care in The Netherlands.Midwifery. 2016 Jun;37:9-18. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2016.03.011. Epub 2016 Apr 1. Midwifery. 2016. PMID: 27217232
-
Insider knowledge as a double-edged sword: an integrative review of midwives' personal childbearing experiences.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Aug 15;22(1):640. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-04962-y. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022. PMID: 35971098 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A metasynthesis of midwife-led care.Qual Health Res. 2012 Jul;22(7):897-910. doi: 10.1177/1049732312440330. Epub 2012 Mar 16. Qual Health Res. 2012. PMID: 22427456 Review.
Cited by
-
The future of midwife-led continuity of care: Call for a dialogue.Dialogues Health. 2024 Jan 28;4:100170. doi: 10.1016/j.dialog.2024.100170. eCollection 2024 Jun. Dialogues Health. 2024. PMID: 38516226 Free PMC article.
-
Quality of care at childbirth during the COVID-19 pandemic in Belgium: a cross-sectional study based on WHO standards.BMJ Open. 2024 Dec 27;14(12):e086937. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086937. BMJ Open. 2024. PMID: 39732493 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources