Seamless Integration of Computer-Adaptive Patient Reported Outcomes into an Electronic Health Record
- PMID: 38154472
- PMCID: PMC10881259
- DOI: 10.1055/a-2235-9557
Seamless Integration of Computer-Adaptive Patient Reported Outcomes into an Electronic Health Record
Abstract
Background: Patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures have become an essential component of quality measurement, quality improvement, and capturing the voice of the patient in clinical care. In 2004, the National Institutes of Health endorsed the importance of PROs by initiating the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS), which leverages computer-adaptive tests (CATs) to reduce patient burden while maintaining measurement precision. Historically, PROMIS CATs have been used in a large number of research studies outside the electronic health record (EHR), but growing demand for clinical use of PROs requires creative information technology solutions for integration into the EHR.
Objectives: This paper describes the introduction of PROMIS CATs into the Epic Systems EHR at a large academic medical center using a tight integration; we describe the process of creating a secure, automatic connection between the application programming interface (API) which scores and selects CAT items and Epic.
Methods: The overarching strategy was to make CATs appear indistinguishable from conventional measures to clinical users, patients, and the EHR software itself. We implemented CATs in Epic without compromising patient data security by creating custom middleware software within the organization's existing middleware framework. This software communicated between the Assessment Center API for item selection and scoring and Epic for item presentation and results. The middleware software seamlessly administered CATs alongside fixed-length, conventional PROs while maintaining the display characteristics and functions of other Epic measures, including automatic display of PROMIS scores in the patient's chart. Pilot implementation revealed differing workflows for clinicians using the software.
Results: The middleware software was adopted in 27 clinics across the hospital system. In the first 2 years of hospital-wide implementation, 793 providers collected 70,446 PROs from patients using this system.
Conclusion: This project demonstrated the importance of regular communication across interdisciplinary teams in the design and development of clinical software. It also demonstrated that implementation relies on buy-in from clinical partners as they integrate new tools into their existing clinical workflow.
The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Conflict of interest statement
The authors do not have any direct financial or personal relationships that conflict with the objectivity of this article's content. However, we wish to mention several indirect relationships. The HealthMeasures/PROMIS team which has supported K.N., N.E.R., M.B., and M.L is funded in part by Assessment Center API licensing fees. D.C. served as President of the PROMIS Health Organization in a noncompensated role. Z.B. is an employee of Phreesia, Inc. and receives equity in the company.
Figures






Similar articles
-
Implementing an Application Programming Interface for PROMIS Measures at Three Medical Centers.Appl Clin Inform. 2021 Oct;12(5):979-983. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1736464. Epub 2021 Oct 20. Appl Clin Inform. 2021. PMID: 34670293 Free PMC article.
-
Integrating Option Grid Patient Decision Aids in the Epic Electronic Health Record: Case Study at 5 Health Systems.J Med Internet Res. 2021 May 3;23(5):e22766. doi: 10.2196/22766. J Med Internet Res. 2021. PMID: 33938806 Free PMC article.
-
AO Patient Outcomes Center: Design, Implementation, and Evaluation of a Software Application for the Collection of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Orthopedic Outpatient Clinics.JMIR Form Res. 2019 Apr 12;3(2):e10880. doi: 10.2196/10880. JMIR Form Res. 2019. PMID: 30977735 Free PMC article.
-
Examining perspectives on the adoption and use of computer-based patient-reported outcomes among clinicians and health professionals: a Q methodology study.J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022 Jan 29;29(3):443-452. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocab257. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022. PMID: 34871423 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Use of Epic Electronic Health Record System for Health Care Research: Scoping Review.J Med Internet Res. 2023 Dec 15;25:e51003. doi: 10.2196/51003. J Med Internet Res. 2023. PMID: 38100185 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Patient-Reported Outcomes Program at Scale at a Cancer Center.JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2025 Apr;9:e2400253. doi: 10.1200/CCI-24-00253. Epub 2025 Apr 22. JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2025. PMID: 40262062
-
Designing an Electronic Patient Reported Outcomes Information Infrastructure Supported by the RE-AIM Implementation Framework.medRxiv [Preprint]. 2025 Apr 1:2025.03.31.25324980. doi: 10.1101/2025.03.31.25324980. medRxiv. 2025. PMID: 40236405 Free PMC article. Preprint.
-
Longitudinal Evaluation of the HABC Monitor Among Trauma Survivors.Clin Interv Aging. 2025 Mar 4;20:245-258. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S492210. eCollection 2025. Clin Interv Aging. 2025. PMID: 40060274 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
A Surgeon's Field Guide to Value-Based Specialty Care.Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2025 Aug 25;10(4):e70239. doi: 10.1002/lio2.70239. eCollection 2025 Aug. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2025. PMID: 40861167 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Selecting patient-reported outcome measures: "what" and "for whom".Health Aff Sch. 2024 Mar 27;2(4):qxae038. doi: 10.1093/haschl/qxae038. eCollection 2024 Apr. Health Aff Sch. 2024. PMID: 38756176 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Basch E. Patient-reported outcomes - harnessing patients' voices to improve clinical care. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(02):105–108. - PubMed
-
- Kotronoulas G, Kearney N, Maguire R et al.What is the value of the routine use of patient-reported outcome measures toward improvement of patient outcomes, processes of care, and health service outcomes in cancer care? A systematic review of controlled trials. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(14):1480–1501. - PubMed
-
- Cella D, Hahn E A, Jensen S E . North Carolina, USA: RTI Press; 2015. Patient-Reported Outcomes in Performance Measurement. - PubMed
-
- HealthMeasures.net Intro to PROMIS®Accessed August 17, 2023 at:https://www.healthmeasures.net/explore-measurement-systems/promis/intro-...
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous