Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Dec 28;13(1):23099.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-49883-8.

Quantitative gait analysis and prediction using artificial intelligence for patients with gait disorders

Affiliations

Quantitative gait analysis and prediction using artificial intelligence for patients with gait disorders

Nawel Ben Chaabane et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Quantitative Gait Analysis (QGA) is considered as an objective measure of gait performance. In this study, we aim at designing an artificial intelligence that can efficiently predict the progression of gait quality using kinematic data obtained from QGA. For this purpose, a gait database collected from 734 patients with gait disorders is used. As the patient walks, kinematic data is collected during the gait session. This data is processed to generate the Gait Profile Score (GPS) for each gait cycle. Tracking potential GPS variations enables detecting changes in gait quality. In this regard, our work is driven by predicting such future variations. Two approaches were considered: signal-based and image-based. The signal-based one uses raw gait cycles, while the image-based one employs a two-dimensional Fast Fourier Transform (2D FFT) representation of gait cycles. Several architectures were developed, and the obtained Area Under the Curve (AUC) was above 0.72 for both approaches. To the best of our knowledge, our study is the first to apply neural networks for gait prediction tasks.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Etiologies pie chart.
Figure 2
Figure 2
MLP architecture for prediction.
Figure 3
Figure 3
LSTM architecture for prediction.
Figure 4
Figure 4
FCN architecture for prediction.
Figure 5
Figure 5
ResNet architecture for prediction.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Encoder architecture for prediction.
Figure 7
Figure 7
t-LeNet architecture for prediction.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Proposed ΔGPS prediction workflow for the image-based approach.
Figure 9
Figure 9
2D FFT for a given gait cycle. (a) The gait cycle; (b) FFT spectrum of the gait cycle; (c) Centralized FFT spectrum of the gait cycle.
Figure 10
Figure 10
Tailored 2D CNN for prediction.
Figure 11
Figure 11
ROC curves for both approaches.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ataullah, A. H. M. & De Jesus, O. Gait Disturbances. in StatPearls (StatPearls Publishing, 2022). - PubMed
    1. Auvinet B, Touzard C, Montestruc F, Delafond A, Goeb V. Gait disorders in the elderly and dual task gait analysis: A new approach for identifying motor phenotypes. J. Neuroeng. Rehabilit. 2017;14:1–14. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bishnoi A, Hernandez ME. Dual task walking costs in older adults with mild cognitive impairment: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Aging Mental Health. 2021;25:1618–1629. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2020.1802576. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pirker W, Katzenschlager R. Gait disorders in adults and the elderly. Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift. 2017;129:81–95. doi: 10.1007/s00508-016-1096-4. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rodrigues F, Domingos C, Monteiro D, Morouço P. A review on aging, sarcopenia, falls, and resistance training in community-dwelling older adults. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2022;19:874. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19020874. - DOI - PMC - PubMed