Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Dec 28:e13571.
doi: 10.1111/mcn.13571. Online ahead of print.

A blueprint for fortification planning and programming: Lessons learned from an analytical review of existing fortification frameworks

Affiliations
Review

A blueprint for fortification planning and programming: Lessons learned from an analytical review of existing fortification frameworks

Roopa Darwar et al. Matern Child Nutr. .

Abstract

With multiple food fortification frameworks, countries can find it challenging to determine optimal methods for planning and implementing food fortification programmes to combat vitamin and mineral deficiencies, especially without additional technical support. To address this challenge, this study aimed to review existing frameworks to determine consistencies, differences, strengths, and weaknesses across the frameworks, and based on the review findings, formulate an enhanced and streamlined fortification framework. Nineteen frameworks were ultimately examined following a comprehensive literature review and key informant interviews. Generally, the reviewed frameworks amply describe motives and methods for the determination of fortification need and feasibility, industry engagement/quality assurance and quality control, and impact evaluations/surveillance. However, there was limited inclusion or discussion throughout the reviewed frameworks around harmonization of fortification with existing micronutrient interventions; fortification policy and/or strategy; enforcement, incentives, and penalties to ensure producer compliance with industry standards; and periodic fortification programme review and reassessment. The findings were used to develop a comprehensive Fortification Blueprint that aims to provide structured guidance and a library of tools and resources to fortification programme managers and key stakeholders to ensure optimal and sustainable programme design.

Keywords: food fortification; fortification design; fortification framework; fortification implementation; micronutrients.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Adams, K. (2023). Modeling the current and potential contributions of large-scale food fortification to meeting micronutrient requirements in Senegal. USAID Advancing Food Fortification Opportunities to Reinforce Diets (AFFORD) and Institute of Global Nutrition, University of California at Davis.
    1. Bailey, L. B., & Hausman, D. B. (2018). Folate status in women of reproductive age as basis of neural tube defect risk assessment: NTD risk assessment in women of reproductive age. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1414(1), 82-95. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.13511
    1. Bégin, F., Cervinskas, J., & Mannar, V. (2001). Food fortification with vitamin A: The potential for contributing to the elimination of vitamin A deficiency in Africa. Food and Nutrition Bulletin, 22(4), 408-415. https://doi.org/10.1177/156482650102200411
    1. Bielderman, I., Vossenaar, M., Melse-Boonstra, A., & Solomons, N. W. (2016). The potential double-burden of vitamin A malnutrition: Under- and overconsumption of fortified table sugar in the Guatemalan highlands. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 70(8), 947-953. https://doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2016.36
    1. Blencowe, H., Kancherla, V., Moorthie, S., Darlison, M. W., & Modell, B. (2018). Estimates of global and regional prevalence of neural tube defects for 2015: A systematic analysis. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1414(1), 31-46. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.13548

LinkOut - more resources