Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Nov 2;18(1):933.
doi: 10.4081/mrm.2023.933. eCollection 2023 Jan 17.

Outcomes comparison between the first and the subsequent SARS-CoV-2 waves - a systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations

Outcomes comparison between the first and the subsequent SARS-CoV-2 waves - a systematic review and meta-analysis

Tulio Caldonazo et al. Multidiscip Respir Med. .

Abstract

Background: In the beginning of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, health care professionals dealing with COVID-19 had to rely exclusively on general supportive measures since specific treatments were unknown. The subsequent waves could be faced with new diagnostic and therapeutic tools (e.g., anti-viral medications and vaccines). We performed a meta-analysis and systematic review to compare clinical endpoints between the first and subsequent waves.

Methods: Three databases were assessed. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. The secondary outcomes were intensive care unit (ICU) mortality, ICU length of stay (LOS), acute renal failure, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) implantation, mechanical ventilation time, hospital LOS, systemic thromboembolism, myocarditis and ventilator associated pneumonia.

Results: A total of 25 studies with 126,153 patients were included. There was no significant difference for the primary endpoint (OR=0.94, 95% CI 0.83-1.07, p=0.35). The first wave group presented higher rates of ICU LOS (SMD= 0.23, 95% CI 0.11-0.35, p<0.01), acute renal failure (OR=1.71, 95% CI 1.36-2.15, p<0.01) and ECMO implantation (OR=1.64, 95% CI 1.06-2.52, p=0.03). The other endpoints did not show significant differences.

Conclusions: The analysis suggests that the first wave group, when compared with the subsequent waves group, presented higher rates of ICU LOS, acute renal failure and ECMO implantation, without significant difference in in-hospital or ICU mortality, mechanical ventilation time, hospital LOS, systemic thromboembolism, myocarditis or ventilator- associated pneumonia.

Keywords: COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; critical care; extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) flow diagram.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Graphical abstract showing the main findings of the analysis.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Forest plot for in-hospital mortality. CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Forest plot for ICU mortality. CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Forest plot for ICU length of stay. CI, confidence interval; SMD, standard mean difference.
Figure 6.
Figure 6.
Forest plot for acute renal failure. CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio.
Figure 7.
Figure 7.
Forest plot for ECMO implantation. CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Wang D, Hu B, Hu C, Zhu F, Liu X, Zhang J, et al. . Clinical characteristics of 138 hospitalized patients with 2019 novel coronavirus-infected pneumonia in Wuhan, China. JAMA 2020;323:1061-9. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cinesi Gómez C, Peñuelas Rodríguez Ó, Luján Torné M, Egea Santaolalla C, Masa Jiménez JF, García Fernández J, et al. . Clinical consensus recommendations regarding non-invasive respiratory support in the adult patient with acute respiratory failure secondary to SARS-CoV-2 infection. Med Intensiva (Engl Ed) 2020;44:429-38. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ospina-Tascón GA, Calderón-Tapia LE, García AF, Zarama V, Gómez-Álvarez F, Álvarez-Saa T, et al. . Effect of high-flow oxygen therapy vs conventional oxygen therapy on invasive mechanical ventilation and clinical recovery in patients with severe COVID-19: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2021;326:2161-71. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Yang X, Yu Y, Xu J, Shu J, Xia J, Liu H, et al. . Clinical course and outcomes of critically ill patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a single-centered, retrospective, observational study. Lancet Respir Med 2020;8:475-81. - PMC - PubMed
    1. RECOVERY Collaborative Group. Tocilizumab in patients admitted to hospital with COVID-19 (RECOVERY): a randomised, controlled, open-label, platform trial. Lancet 2021;397:1637-45. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources