Outcomes comparison between the first and the subsequent SARS-CoV-2 waves - a systematic review and meta-analysis
- PMID: 38155706
- PMCID: PMC10690722
- DOI: 10.4081/mrm.2023.933
Outcomes comparison between the first and the subsequent SARS-CoV-2 waves - a systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Background: In the beginning of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, health care professionals dealing with COVID-19 had to rely exclusively on general supportive measures since specific treatments were unknown. The subsequent waves could be faced with new diagnostic and therapeutic tools (e.g., anti-viral medications and vaccines). We performed a meta-analysis and systematic review to compare clinical endpoints between the first and subsequent waves.
Methods: Three databases were assessed. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. The secondary outcomes were intensive care unit (ICU) mortality, ICU length of stay (LOS), acute renal failure, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) implantation, mechanical ventilation time, hospital LOS, systemic thromboembolism, myocarditis and ventilator associated pneumonia.
Results: A total of 25 studies with 126,153 patients were included. There was no significant difference for the primary endpoint (OR=0.94, 95% CI 0.83-1.07, p=0.35). The first wave group presented higher rates of ICU LOS (SMD= 0.23, 95% CI 0.11-0.35, p<0.01), acute renal failure (OR=1.71, 95% CI 1.36-2.15, p<0.01) and ECMO implantation (OR=1.64, 95% CI 1.06-2.52, p=0.03). The other endpoints did not show significant differences.
Conclusions: The analysis suggests that the first wave group, when compared with the subsequent waves group, presented higher rates of ICU LOS, acute renal failure and ECMO implantation, without significant difference in in-hospital or ICU mortality, mechanical ventilation time, hospital LOS, systemic thromboembolism, myocarditis or ventilator- associated pneumonia.
Keywords: COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; critical care; extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.
Copyright © 2023, the Author(s).
Figures







Similar articles
-
Safety and Efficacy of Imatinib for Hospitalized Adults with COVID-19: A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.Trials. 2020 Oct 28;21(1):897. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04819-9. Trials. 2020. PMID: 33115543 Free PMC article.
-
Effectiveness of dexmedetomidine versus propofol on extubation times, length of stay and mortality rates in adult cardiac surgery patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2018 May;16(5):1220-1239. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2017-003488. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2018. PMID: 29762314
-
Testing the efficacy and safety of BIO101, for the prevention of respiratory deterioration, in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia (COVA study): a structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.Trials. 2021 Jan 11;22(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04998-5. Trials. 2021. PMID: 33430924 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of the clinical features in open and closed format intensive care units: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2021 Dec;40(6):100950. doi: 10.1016/j.accpm.2021.100950. Epub 2021 Sep 20. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2021. PMID: 34555538
-
Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) Dependent Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Cureus. 2022 Jun 6;14(6):e25696. doi: 10.7759/cureus.25696. eCollection 2022 Jun. Cureus. 2022. PMID: 35812597 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Factors associated with the intubation of patients with acute respiratory failure and their impact on mortality: a retrospective cohort study.BMC Pulm Med. 2025 Jul 3;25(1):308. doi: 10.1186/s12890-025-03773-z. BMC Pulm Med. 2025. PMID: 40611169 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Cinesi Gómez C, Peñuelas Rodríguez Ó, Luján Torné M, Egea Santaolalla C, Masa Jiménez JF, García Fernández J, et al. . Clinical consensus recommendations regarding non-invasive respiratory support in the adult patient with acute respiratory failure secondary to SARS-CoV-2 infection. Med Intensiva (Engl Ed) 2020;44:429-38. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Ospina-Tascón GA, Calderón-Tapia LE, García AF, Zarama V, Gómez-Álvarez F, Álvarez-Saa T, et al. . Effect of high-flow oxygen therapy vs conventional oxygen therapy on invasive mechanical ventilation and clinical recovery in patients with severe COVID-19: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2021;326:2161-71. - PMC - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous