Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Nov 29;3(1):e213.
doi: 10.1017/ash.2023.492. eCollection 2023.

Are reporting guidelines used in infectious diseases publications? An analysis of more than 1,000 articles

Aldo Barajas-Ochoa  1 , Manuel Ramirez-Trejo  2 , Aditee Dash  1 , Jillian E Raybould  1 , Gonzalo Bearman  1
Affiliations

Are reporting guidelines used in infectious diseases publications? An analysis of more than 1,000 articles

Aldo Barajas-Ochoa et al. Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol. .

Abstract

Objective: To assess whether 16 reporting guidelines of Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of Health Research (EQUATOR) were used in infectious diseases research publications.

Design: This cross-sectional, audit-type study assessed articles published in five infectious diseases journals in 2019.

Methods: All articles were manually reviewed to assess if a reporting guideline was advisable and searched for the names and acronyms of 16 reporting guidelines. An "advisable use rate" was calculated.

Results: We reviewed 1,251 manuscripts across five infectious diseases journals. Guideline use was advisable for 973 (75%) articles. Reporting guidelines were used in 85 articles, 6.1% of total articles, and 8% (95% CI 6%-9%) of articles for which guidelines were advised. The advisable use rate ranged from 0.06 to 0.17 for any guideline, 0-0.08 for CONSORT, 0.53-1 for Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA), and 0-0.66 for Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD) : The TRIPOD statement. No trends were observed across the five journals.

Conclusions: The use of EQUATOR-related reporting guidelines is infrequent, despite journals and publishers promoting their usage. Whether this finding is attributable to knowledge, acceptance, or perceived usefulness of the guidelines still needs to be clarified.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

All authors report no conflicts of interest relevant to this article.

References

    1. National Research Council (US) Committee on Responsibilities of Authorship in the Biological Sciences. Sharing Publication-related Data and Materials: Responsibilities of Authorship in the Life Sciences. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2003. The Purpose of Publication and Responsibilities for Sharing. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK97153/ - PubMed
    1. PLOS Medicine Editors. Better reporting of scientific studies: why it matters. PLoS Med 2013;10:e1001504. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001504. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chalmers I. Underreporting research is scientific misconduct. JAMA 1990;263:1405–1408. - PubMed
    1. Barajas-Ochoa A, Cisneros-Barrios A, Ramos-Remus C. Evaluation of the quality and subsequent performance of manuscripts rejected by Clinical Rheumatology: a research report. Clin Rheumatol 2022;41:2541–2551. doi: 10.1007/s10067-022-06238-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. The EQUATOR Network. https://www.equator-network.org/. Accessed 14 July 2022.

LinkOut - more resources