Challenges and pitfalls in classification of disproportionate mitral regurgitation
- PMID: 38159132
- DOI: 10.1007/s10554-023-03043-1
Challenges and pitfalls in classification of disproportionate mitral regurgitation
Abstract
The concept of disproportionate mitral regurgitation (dispropMR) has been introduced to identify patients with functional mitral regurgitation (MR) who benefit from percutaneous treatment. We aimed to examine echocardiographic characteristics behind this entity. We retrospectively included 172 consecutive patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and more than mild MR referred to clinically indicated echocardiography. According to the proportionality ratio (effective regurgitant orifice area (EROA)/left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV)) patients were divided into dispropMR and proportionate MR (propMR) group. Potential factors which might affect proportionality definition were analyzed. 55 patients (32%) had dispropMR. Discrepant grading of MR severity was observed when using regurgitant volume (RegVol) by proximal isovelocity surface area (PISA) method or volumetric method, with significant discordance only in dispropMR (p < 0.001). Patients with dispropMR had more frequently left ventricular foreshortened images for LVEDV calculation than patients with propMR (p = 0.003), resulting in smaller LVEDV in dispropMR group. DispropMR group had more substantial dynamic variation of regurgitant flow compared to propMR. Accordingly, EROA was consistently overestimated by standard single-point PISA method compared to serial PISA method. This was more pronounced in dispropMR (bias:10.5 ± 28.3 mm2) compared to propMR group (bias:6.4 ± 12.8 mm2). DispropMR may be found in roughly one third of clinically indicated echocardiographic studies in patients with reduced LVEF and more than mild MR. EROA overestimation due to dynamic variation of regurgitant flow and LVEDV underestimation due to LV foreshortening were more frequently found in dispropMR. Our results indicate that methodological limitations of echocardiographic MR grading could not be neglected in classifying the proportionality of MR.
Keywords: Echocardiography; Mitral regurgitation; Proximal isovelocity surface area method; Serial PISA; Volumetric method.
© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V.
References
-
- Vahanian A, Beyersdorf F, Praz F et al (2022) 2021 ESC/EACTS guidelines for the management of valvular Heart Disease. Eur Heart J 43:561–632. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehab395 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Feldman T, Kar S, Elmariah S et al (2015) Randomized comparison of Percutaneous repair and Surgery for mitral regurgitation. J Am Coll Cardiol 66:2844–2854. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2015.10.018 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Obadia J-F, Messika-Zeitoun D, Leurent G et al (2018) Percutaneous Repair or Medical Treatment for secondary mitral regurgitation. N Engl J Med 379:2297–2306. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1805374 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Stone GW, Lindenfeld J, Abraham WT et al (2018) Transcatheter mitral-valve repair in patients with Heart Failure. N Engl J Med 379:2307–2318. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1806640 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Senni M, Adamo M, Metra M et al (2019) Treatment of functional mitral regurgitation in chronic Heart Failure: can we get a ‘proof of concept’ from the MITRA-FR and COAPT trials? Eur J Heart Fail 21:852–861. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.1491 - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
