Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Nov 28;15(11):e49602.
doi: 10.7759/cureus.49602. eCollection 2023 Nov.

Prevalence of Retinopathy in Prediabetic Populations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Affiliations
Review

Prevalence of Retinopathy in Prediabetic Populations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Manjiri P Sune et al. Cureus. .

Abstract

Among the leading causes of vision impairment and blindness globally, diabetic retinopathy (DR) is one of the most important causes. There is increasing evidence of DR prevalence in the prediabetic population. This systematic review presents collective data on retinopathy in the prediabetic population. This review article aimed to estimate the reported prevalence of retinopathy in prediabetes, impaired glucose tolerance test (GTT) without diabetes mellitus, and the risk factors involved and to summarize it. Literature searches were done using the Web of Science, CINAHL, Google Scholar, Cochrane, EMBASE, and PubMed databases from inception to April 2023. Our search included the words prediabetes, DR, and risk factors. All searches were looked at for methodological quality and evidence. Thirty-one studies were included after the screening. Population-based data were used in 23 studies (82.1%). The prediabetic population screened was 10,539. The prevalence of retinopathy ranged between 0.3% and 20.9%, showing a median of 8.1% with an interquartile range (IQR) of 4.2-11%, showing great variance in estimates due to the use of different screening methods, methods used for retinopathy grading, and study populations. Several studies compared the population with normal GTT with impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) and inferred that there was a lower prevalence of retinopathy in the normal GTT population (3.0%, IQR 0.3-7.4%) than prediabetes (6.7%, IQR 1.9-10.1%). According to this data, a greater retinopathy prevalence was found in prediabetic populations.

Keywords: diabetic retinopathy; impaired fasting glucose; impaired glucose tolerance; prediabetes; prevalence.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. PRISMA flowchart showing the study selection process
Figure 2
Figure 2. Forest plot of the prevalence of retinopathy in the prediabetic population from the included studies
∗ Prediabetes group size estimated from the reported retinopathy prevalence and the number of affected individuals. ∗∗ Aggregate prevalence estimates presented for impaired fasting glucose (IFG), impaired glucose tolerance (IGT), and combined IFG and IGT (IFG-IGT). All studies are population-based, except three hospital-based studies (lavender highlights) and two randomized-controlled trials (yellow highlights). CI: confidence interval
Figure 3
Figure 3. Forest plot of the prevalence of retinopathy in the prediabetic population and NGT from included studies reporting data for both groups
Normal glucose tolerance (NGT) prevalence estimates in red and prediabetes prevalence estimates in blue. 1 Prediabetes group size estimated from reported retinopathy prevalence and number of affected individuals. 2 Impaired fasting glucose (IFG), impaired glucose tolerance (IGT), and combined IFG and IGT (IFG/IGT) retinopathy prevalence estimates aggregated with total prediabetes group size used for 95% confidence interval (CI) estimation. 3 NGT group size estimated from the total study sample minus the reported prediabetes population. 4 Prediabetes group size estimated from reported retinopathy prevalence and number of affected individuals. All studies are population-based, except two hospital-based studies (lavender highlights).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Definition, diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus and its complications. Part 1: diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus provisional report of a WHO consultation. Alberti KG, Zimmet PZ. Diabet Med. 1998;15:539–553. - PubMed
    1. Harmonizing the metabolic syndrome: a joint interim statement of the International Diabetes Federation Task Force on Epidemiology and Prevention; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; American Heart Association; World Heart Federation; International Atherosclerosis Society; and International Association for the Study of Obesity. Alberti KG, Eckel RH, Grundy SM, et al. Circulation. 2009;120:1640–1645. - PubMed
    1. 2. Classification and diagnosis of diabetes: standards of medical care in diabetes-2018. Diabetes Care. 2018;41:0–27. - PubMed
    1. Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 2010;33 Suppl 1:0–9. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Report of the expert committee on the diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 1997;20:1183–1197. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources