Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Dec 15:5:1287621.
doi: 10.3389/frph.2023.1287621. eCollection 2023.

Novel embryo selection strategies-finding the right balance

Affiliations

Novel embryo selection strategies-finding the right balance

Alex Polyakov et al. Front Reprod Health. .

Abstract

The use of novel technologies in the selection of embryos during in vitro fertilisation (IVF) has the potential to improve the chances of pregnancy and birth of a healthy child. However, it is important to be aware of the potential risks and unintended consequences that may arise from the premature implementation of these technologies. This article discusses the ethical considerations surrounding the use of novel embryo selection technologies in IVF, including the growing uptake of genetic testing and others, and argues that prioritising embryos for transfer using these technologies is acceptable, but discarding embryos based on unproven advances is not. Several historical examples are provided, which demonstrate possible harms, where the overall chance of pregnancy may have been reduced, and some patients may have missed out on biological parenthood altogether. We emphasise the need for caution and a balanced approach to ensure that the benefits of these technologies outweigh any potential harm. We also highlight the primacy of patients' autonomy in reproductive decision-making, especially when information gained by utilising novel technologies is imprecise.

Keywords: IVF (in vitro fertilization); PGT (preimplantation genetic testing); embryo; infertility; novel technologies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Gardner DK, Meseguer M, Rubio C, Treff NR. Diagnosis of human preimplantation embryo viability. Hum Reprod Update. (2015) 21(6):727–47. 10.1093/humupd/dmu064 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Polyakov A, Amor DJ, Savulescu J, Gyngell C, Georgiou EX, Ross V, et al. Polygenic risk score for embryo selection-not ready for prime time. Hum Reprod. (2022) 37(10):2229–36. 10.1093/humrep/deac159 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. De Neubourg D, Dancet EAF, Pinborg A. Single-embryo transfer implies quality of care in reproductive medicine. Reprod Biomed Online. (2022) 45(5):899–905. 10.1016/j.rbmo.2022.04.001 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Xiao Y, Wang X, Gui T, Tao T, Xiong W. Transfer of a poor-quality along with a good-quality embryo on in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection-embryo transfer clinical outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. (2022) 118(6):1066–79. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.08.848 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Asch A, Barlevy D. Disability and genetics: a disability critique of pre-natal testing and pre-implantation genetic diagnosis (PGD). eLS.

LinkOut - more resources