Novel embryo selection strategies-finding the right balance
- PMID: 38162011
- PMCID: PMC10757847
- DOI: 10.3389/frph.2023.1287621
Novel embryo selection strategies-finding the right balance
Abstract
The use of novel technologies in the selection of embryos during in vitro fertilisation (IVF) has the potential to improve the chances of pregnancy and birth of a healthy child. However, it is important to be aware of the potential risks and unintended consequences that may arise from the premature implementation of these technologies. This article discusses the ethical considerations surrounding the use of novel embryo selection technologies in IVF, including the growing uptake of genetic testing and others, and argues that prioritising embryos for transfer using these technologies is acceptable, but discarding embryos based on unproven advances is not. Several historical examples are provided, which demonstrate possible harms, where the overall chance of pregnancy may have been reduced, and some patients may have missed out on biological parenthood altogether. We emphasise the need for caution and a balanced approach to ensure that the benefits of these technologies outweigh any potential harm. We also highlight the primacy of patients' autonomy in reproductive decision-making, especially when information gained by utilising novel technologies is imprecise.
Keywords: IVF (in vitro fertilization); PGT (preimplantation genetic testing); embryo; infertility; novel technologies.
© 2023 Polyakov, Rozen, Gyngell and Savulescu.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Similar articles
-
Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (abnormal number of chromosomes) in in vitro fertilisation.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Sep 8;9(9):CD005291. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005291.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020. PMID: 32898291 Free PMC article.
-
Beyond the biopsy: predictors of decision regret and anxiety following preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy.Hum Reprod. 2019 Jul 8;34(7):1260-1269. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dez080. Hum Reprod. 2019. PMID: 31220868
-
Perceptions, motivations and decision regret surrounding preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy.Hum Reprod. 2020 Sep 1;35(9):2047-2057. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deaa154. Hum Reprod. 2020. PMID: 32756971
-
Preimplantation genetic testing is not a preferred recommendation for patients with X chromosome abnormalities.Hum Reprod. 2021 Aug 18;36(9):2612-2621. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deab177. Hum Reprod. 2021. PMID: 34323971 Free PMC article.
-
The 2019 PGDIS position statement on transfer of mosaic embryos within a context of new information on PGT-A.Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2020 May 29;18(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s12958-020-00616-w. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2020. PMID: 32471441 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Ethical considerations in AI for child health and recommendations for child-centered medical AI.NPJ Digit Med. 2025 Mar 10;8(1):152. doi: 10.1038/s41746-025-01541-1. NPJ Digit Med. 2025. PMID: 40065130 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The Role of One-Carbon Metabolism and Methyl Donors in Medically Assisted Reproduction: A Narrative Review of the Literature.Int J Mol Sci. 2024 May 2;25(9):4977. doi: 10.3390/ijms25094977. Int J Mol Sci. 2024. PMID: 38732193 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Xiao Y, Wang X, Gui T, Tao T, Xiong W. Transfer of a poor-quality along with a good-quality embryo on in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection-embryo transfer clinical outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. (2022) 118(6):1066–79. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.08.848 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Asch A, Barlevy D. Disability and genetics: a disability critique of pre-natal testing and pre-implantation genetic diagnosis (PGD). eLS.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources