Emergency transvenous temporary pacing during rotational atherectomy
- PMID: 38162131
- PMCID: PMC10755921
- DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1322459
Emergency transvenous temporary pacing during rotational atherectomy
Abstract
Background: Rotational atherectomy (RA) during percutaneous coronary intervention may cause transient bradycardia or a higher-degree heart block. Traditionally, some operators use prophylactic transvenous pacing wire (TPW) to avoid haemodynamic complications associated with bradycardia.
Objective: We sought to establish the frequency of bail-out need for emergency TPW insertion in patients undergoing RA that have received no upfront TPW insertion.
Methods: We performed a single-centre retrospective study of all patients undergoing RA between October 2009 and October 2022. Patient characteristics, procedural variables, and in-hospital complications were registered.
Results: A total of 331 patients who underwent RA procedure were analysed. No patients underwent prophylactic TPW insertion. The mean age was 73.3 ± 9.1 years, 71.6% (n = 237) were male, while nearly half of the patients were diabetic [N = 158 (47.7%)]. The right coronary artery was the most common target for RA (40.8%), followed by the left anterior descending (34.1%), left circumflex (14.8%), and left main stem artery (10.3%). Altogether 20 (6%) patients required intraprocedural atropine therapy. Emergency TPW insertion was needed in one (0.3%) patient only. Eight (2.4%) patients died, although only one (0.3%) was adjudicated as being possibly related to RA-induced bradycardia. Five patients (1.5%) had ventricular fibrillation arrest, while nine (2.7%) required cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Six (1.8%) procedures were complicated by coronary perforation, two (0.6%) were complicated by tamponade, while 17 (5.1%) patients experienced vascular access complications.
Conclusions: Bail-out transvenous temporary pacing is very rarely required during RA. A standby temporary pacing strategy seems reasonable and may avoid unnecessary TPW complications compared with routine use.
Keywords: bradycardia; complications; conduction disorders; heart block; percutaneous coronary intervention; rotational atherectomy; transvenous temporary pacing.
© 2023 Schwarz, Mascherbauer, Schmidt, Zirkler, Lamm, Vock, Kwok, Borovac, Mousavi, Hoppe, Leibundgut and Will.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. GL declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer-review process and the final decision.
Figures
References
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
