Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Dec 12:37:100816.
doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2023.100816. eCollection 2024 Feb.

Risk of severe COVID-19 outcomes after autumn 2022 COVID-19 booster vaccinations: a pooled analysis of national prospective cohort studies involving 7.4 million adults in England, Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales

Affiliations

Risk of severe COVID-19 outcomes after autumn 2022 COVID-19 booster vaccinations: a pooled analysis of national prospective cohort studies involving 7.4 million adults in England, Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales

Stuart Bedston et al. Lancet Reg Health Eur. .

Abstract

Background: UK COVID-19 vaccination policy has evolved to offering COVID-19 booster doses to individuals at increased risk of severe Illness from COVID-19. Building on our analyses of vaccine effectiveness of first, second and initial booster doses, we aimed to identify individuals at increased risk of severe outcomes (i.e., COVID-19 related hospitalisation or death) post the autumn 2022 booster dose.

Methods: We undertook a national population-based cohort analysis across all four UK nations through linked primary care, vaccination, hospitalisation and mortality data. We included individuals who received autumn 2022 booster doses of BNT162b2 (Comirnaty) or mRNA-1273 (Spikevax) during the period September 1, 2022 to December 31, 2022 to investigate the risk of severe COVID-19 outcomes. Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the association between demographic and clinical factors and severe COVID-19 outcomes after the autumn booster dose. Analyses were adjusted for age, sex, body mass index (BMI), deprivation, urban/rural areas and comorbidities. Stratified analyses were conducted by vaccine type. We then conducted a fixed-effect meta-analysis to combine results across the four UK nations.

Findings: Between September 1, 2022 and December 31, 2022, 7,451,890 individuals ≥18 years received an autumn booster dose. 3500 had severe COVID-19 outcomes (2.9 events per 1000 person-years). Being male (male vs female, aHR 1.41 (1.32-1.51)), older adults (≥80 years vs 18-49 years; 10.43 (8.06-13.50)), underweight (BMI <18.5 vs BMI 25.0-29.9; 2.94 (2.51-3.44)), those with comorbidities (≥5 comorbidities vs none; 9.45 (8.15-10.96)) had a higher risk of COVID-19 hospitalisation or death after the autumn booster dose. Those with a larger household size (≥11 people within household vs 2 people; 1.56 (1.23-1.98)) and from more deprived areas (most deprived vs least deprived quintile; 1.35 (1.21-1.51)) had modestly higher risks. We also observed at least a two-fold increase in risk for those with various chronic neurological conditions, including Down's syndrome, immunodeficiency, chronic kidney disease, cancer, chronic respiratory disease, or cardiovascular disease.

Interpretation: Males, older individuals, underweight individuals, those with an increasing number of comorbidities, from a larger household or more deprived areas, and those with specific underlying health conditions remained at increased risk of COVID-19 hospitalisation and death after the autumn 2022 vaccine booster dose. There is now a need to focus on these risk groups for investigating immunogenicity and efficacy of further booster doses or therapeutics.

Funding: National Core Studies-Immunity, UK Research and Innovation (Medical Research Council and Economic and Social Research Council), Health Data Research UK, the Scottish Government, and the University of Edinburgh.

Keywords: Booster dose; COVID-19; Hospital admission; Vaccine; Vaccine breakthrough.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

AS and CR are members of the Scottish Government's CMO COVID-19 Advisory Group. AS and CR are members of NERVTAG's risk stratification subgroup. CR is a member of SPI-M. AS is a member of AstraZeneca's Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Advisory Group and the Scottish Government's Standing Committee on Pandemics. All roles are unremunerated. RAL is a member of the Welsh Government COVID-19 Technical Advisory Group. All other co-authors report no conflict of interests. SdeL is Director of the RSC, through his university he has received vaccine related research funding from AstraZeneca, GSK, Sanofi, Seqirus, MSD and Takeda, and been member of advisory boards for AstraZeneca, GSK, Sanofi and Seqirus.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Cohort selection flow diagram.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Meta, adjusted hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals for vaccination, socio-demographics and clinical factors associated with severe COVID-19 outcomes, across England (n = 4,348,220), Northern Ireland (n = 455,290), Scotland (n = 1,829,690), and Wales (n = 818,690). ∗ England, Scotland and Wales only. † England only. ‡ Scotland, Wales, Northern Ireland only. ‖ Northern Ireland only.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Meta, adjusted hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals for individual QCovid clinical conditions associated with severe COVID-19 outcomes, across England (n = 4,348,220), Scotland (n = 1,829,690), and Wales (n = 818,690), only. Point size is mapped to the prevalence of the condition among the combined cohort. † England only. § Scotland and Wales only. ¶ England and Wales only.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. UK Department of Health & Social Care . 2022. JCVI statement on the COVID-19 booster vaccination programme for autumn 2022: update 3 September 2022.https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/covid-19-vaccines-for-autumn-...
    1. Chae C., Kim R.K., Jang E.J., et al. Comparing the effectiveness of bivalent and monovalent COVID-19 vaccines against COVID-19 infection during the winter season of 2022-2023: a real-world retrospective observational matched cohort study in the Republic of Korea. Int J Infect Dis. 2023;135:95–100. - PubMed
    1. Arbel R., Peretz A., Sergienko R., et al. Effectiveness of a bivalent mRNA vaccine booster dose to prevent severe COVID-19 outcomes: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2023;23(8):914–921. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lin D.Y., Xu Y., Gu Y., et al. Effectiveness of bivalent boosters against severe Omicron infection. N Engl J Med. 2023;388(8):764–766. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tan C.Y., Chiew C.J., Pang D., et al. Effectiveness of bivalent mRNA vaccines against medically attended symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19-related hospital admission among SARS-CoV-2-naive and previously infected individuals: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2023;23:1343. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources