Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Dec 29;5(1):e13084.
doi: 10.1002/emp2.13084. eCollection 2024 Feb.

Frailty assessment tools in the emergency department: A geriatric emergency department guidelines 2.0 scoping review

Affiliations

Frailty assessment tools in the emergency department: A geriatric emergency department guidelines 2.0 scoping review

Lisa A Wolf et al. J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. .

Abstract

Objective: Given the aging population and growing burden of frailty, we conducted this scoping review to describe the available literature regarding the use and impact of frailty assessment tools in the assessment and care of emergency department (ED) patients older than 60 years.

Methods: A search was made of the available literature using the Covidence system using various search terms. Inclusion criteria comprised peer-reviewed literature focusing on frailty screening tools used for a geriatric population (60+ years of age) presenting to EDs. An additional search of PubMed, EBSCO, and CINAHL for articles published in the last 5 years was conducted toward the end of the review process (January 2023) to search specifically for literature describing interventions for frailty, yielding additional articles for review. Exclusion criteria comprised articles focusing on an age category other than geriatric and care environments outside the emergency care setting.

Results: A total of 135 articles were screened for inclusion and 48 duplicates were removed. Of the 87 remaining articles, 20 were deemed irrelevant, leaving 67 articles for full-text review. Twenty-eight were excluded for not meeting inclusion criteria, leaving 39 full-text studies. Use of frailty screening tools were reported in the triage, care, and discharge decision-making phases of the ED care trajectory, with varying reports of usefulness for clinical decision-making.

Conclusion: The literature reports tools, scales, and instruments for identifying frailty in older patients at ED triage; multiple frailty scores or tools exist with varying levels of utilization. Interventions for frailty directed at the ED environment were scant. Further research is needed to determine the usefulness of frailty identification in the context of emergency care, the effects of care delivery interventions or educational initiatives for front-line medical professionals on patient-oriented outcomes, and to ensure these initiatives are acceptable for patients.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
PRISMA diagram.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Vincent G, Velkoff V. The Next Four Decades: The Older Population in the United States: 2010 to 2050. Current Population Reports. 25‐1138. U.S. Census Bureau. Washington, DC. https://www.census.gov/library/publications/2010/demo/p25-1138.html
    1. He W, Goodkind D, Kowal P. International Population Reports. US Census Bureau. https://www.nia.nih.gov/sites/default/files/d7/p95‐12‐01.pdf
    1. Dent E, Kowal P, Hoogendijk EO. Frailty measurement in research and clinical practice: a review. Eur J Intern Med. 2016;31:3‐10. doi:10.1016/j.ejim.2016.03.007 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Beard JR, Officer A, de Carvalho IA, et al. The world report on ageing and health: a policy framework for healthy ageing. Lancet Lond Engl. 2016;387(10033):2145‐2154. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00516-4 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Salvi F, Morichi V, Grilli A, et al. Screening for frailty in elderly emergency department patients by using the Identification of Seniors At Risk (ISAR). J Nutr Health Aging. 2012;16(4):313‐318. doi:10.1007/s12603-011-0155-9 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types