A systematic review of tools for predicting complications in patients with influenza-like illness
- PMID: 38163091
- PMCID: PMC10755309
- DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23227
A systematic review of tools for predicting complications in patients with influenza-like illness
Abstract
Objective: To identify tools that predict the risk of complications for patients presenting to an outpatient clinic or an emergency department (ED) with influenza-like illness.
Methods: We searched Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library and CINAHL from inception to July 2023. We included articles reporting on the derivation or validation of a score or algorithm used to stratify the risk of hospitalization or mortality among patients with influenza-like illness in the ED or outpatient clinic.
Results: Twelve articles reporting on eight scores and six predictive models were identified. For predicting the need for hospitalization, the area under the curve (AUC) of the PMEWS and the CURB-65 ranged respectively from 0.76 to 0.94, and 0.65 to 0.88. The Community Assessment Tool had an AUC of 0.62. For predicting inpatient mortality, AUC was 0.66 for PMEWS and 0.79 for CURB-65, 0.79 for the SIRS criteria and 0.86 for the qSOFA score. Two scores were developed without external validation during the Covid-19 pandemic. The CovHos score and the Canadian Covid discharge score had an AUC ranged from 0.70 to 0.91. The predictive models performed adequately (AUC from 0.76 to 0.92) but will require external validation for clinical use. Tool diversity and study population heterogeneity precluded meta-analysis.
Conclusion: Although the CURB, PMEWS and qSOFA scores appear to predict accurately the risk of complications of influenza-like illness, none were reliable enough to justify their widespread ED use. Refinement of an existing tool or development of a new tool to optimize the management of these patients is needed.
Keywords: Hospitalization; Influenza-like illness; Mortality; Outpatient; Risk stratification tool.
© 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests:Simon Berthelot reports article publishing charges was provided by Quebec Ministry of the Economy and Innovation. If there are other authors, they declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Prognostic accuracy of SIRS criteria and qSOFA score for in-hospital mortality among influenza patients in the emergency department.BMC Infect Dis. 2020 May 29;20(1):385. doi: 10.1186/s12879-020-05102-7. BMC Infect Dis. 2020. PMID: 32471385 Free PMC article.
-
Head-to-head comparison of qSOFA and SIRS criteria in predicting the mortality of infected patients in the emergency department: a meta-analysis.Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2018 Jul 11;26(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s13049-018-0527-9. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2018. PMID: 29996880 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Comparison of the National Early Warning Score (NEWS) and the Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS) for predicting admission and in-hospital mortality in elderly patients in the pre-hospital setting and in the emergency department.PeerJ. 2019 May 16;7:e6947. doi: 10.7717/peerj.6947. eCollection 2019. PeerJ. 2019. PMID: 31143553 Free PMC article.
-
Performance of the Pandemic Medical Early Warning Score (PMEWS), Simple Triage Scoring System (STSS) and Confusion, Uremia, Respiratory rate, Blood pressure and age ≥ 65 (CURB-65) score among patients with COVID-19 pneumonia in an emergency department triage setting: a retrospective study.Sao Paulo Med J. 2021 Mar-Apr;139(2):170-177. doi: 10.1590/1516-3180.2020.0649.R1.10122020. Sao Paulo Med J. 2021. PMID: 33681885 Free PMC article.
-
Accuracy of quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) score and systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria for predicting mortality in hospitalized patients with suspected infection: a meta-analysis of observational studies.Clin Microbiol Infect. 2018 Nov;24(11):1123-1129. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2018.03.032. Epub 2018 Mar 29. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2018. PMID: 29605565
Cited by
-
Comparative Effectiveness of CURB-65 and qSOFA Scores in Predicting Pneumonia Outcomes: A Systematic Review.Cureus. 2024 Oct 13;16(10):e71394. doi: 10.7759/cureus.71394. eCollection 2024 Oct. Cureus. 2024. PMID: 39539877 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Occurrence of Circulating Antibodies against the Hemagglutinins of Influenza Viruses in the 2022/2023 Epidemic Season in Poland.Viruses. 2024 Jul 9;16(7):1105. doi: 10.3390/v16071105. Viruses. 2024. PMID: 39066267 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Gaitonde D.Y., Moore F.C., Morgan M.K. Influenza: diagnosis and treatment. Am Fam Physician. 15 déc. 2019;100(12):751–758. - PubMed
-
- Putri W.C.W.S., Muscatello D.J., Stockwell M.S., Newall A.T. Economic burden of seasonal influenza in the United States. Vaccine. 22 juin. 2018;36(27):3960–3966. - PubMed
-
- Singanayagam A., Chalmers J.D., Hill A.T. Severity assessment in community-acquired pneumonia: a review. QJM Mon J Assoc Physicians. juin. 2009;102(6):379–388. - PubMed
-
- British Infection Society, British Thoracic Society Health protection agency. Pandemic flu: clinical management of patients with an influenza-like illness during an influenza pandemic. Provisional guidelines from the British infection society, British thoracic society, and health protection agency in collaboration with the department of health. Thorax. janv. 2007;62(Suppl 1):1–46. - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources