Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Jan-Feb;42(1):56-64.
doi: 10.1002/bsl.2643. Epub 2024 Jan 1.

Capital sentencing and neuropsychiatry

Affiliations
Review

Capital sentencing and neuropsychiatry

Samuel Jan Brakel et al. Behav Sci Law. 2024 Jan-Feb.

Abstract

The neuropsychiatric contribution to capital sentencing proceedings has grown substantially in recent decades as the consideration of neurological and psychiatric factors in criminal behavior has been increasingly accepted as relevant to the quest for justice. This review article will focus on the legal theories underlying neuropsychiatric input into capital sentencing decisions, as well as some of the investigative techniques and resulting data which may be offered by forensic neuropsychiatrists in this context. The death penalty is unique in its severity and irreversibility, as the courts, including the U.S. Supreme Court, have noted repeatedly. "Death is different," and the recognition of this has generated a set of court decisions and statutes pertinent specifically to capital proceedings, both procedural and substantive.

Keywords: aggravation; capital punishment; criminal sentencing; death penalty; ethics; forensic neuropsychiatry; intellectual disability; juvenile offenders; mitigation; psychopathy; risk assessment.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Atkins v. Virginia, 536 U.S. 304 (2002a).
    1. Atkins v. Virginia, 536 U.S. 304 Scalia dissent at 337 (2002b).
    1. Barefoot v. Estelle, 463 U.S. 880 (1983).
    1. Beck, J. C. (1993). The role of psychiatry in death penalty defense. Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry & Law, 21(4), 453-463. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8054675
    1. Bernet, W., Vnencak-Jones, C. L., Farahany, N., & Montgomery, S. A. (2007). Bad nature, bad nurture, and testimony regarding MAOA and SLC6A4 genotyping at murder trials. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 52(6), 1362-1371. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2007.00562.x