Mobility level and factors affecting mobility status in hospitalized patients admitted in single-occupancy patient rooms
- PMID: 38163905
- PMCID: PMC10759502
- DOI: 10.1186/s12912-023-01648-4
Mobility level and factors affecting mobility status in hospitalized patients admitted in single-occupancy patient rooms
Abstract
Background: Although stimulating patients' mobility is considered a component of fundamental nursing care, approximately 35% of hospitalized patients experience functional decline during or after hospital admission. The aim of this study is to assess mobility level and to identify factors affecting mobility status in hospitalized patients admitted in single-occupancy patient rooms (SPRs) on general wards.
Methods: Mobility level was quantified with the Johns Hopkins Highest Level of Mobility Scale (JH-HLM) and EQ-5D-3L. GENEActiv accelerometer data over 24 h were collected in a subset of patients. Data were analyzed using generalized ordinal logistic regression analysis. The STROBE reporting checklist was applied.
Results: Wearing pajamas during daytime, having pain, admission in an isolation room, and wearing three or more medical equipment were negatively associated with mobilization level. More than half of patients (58.9%) who were able to mobilize according to the EQ-5D-3L did not achieve the highest possible level of mobility according to the JH-HLM. The subset of patients that wore an accelerometer spent most of the day in sedentary behavior (median 88.1%, IQR 85.9-93.6). The median total daily step count was 1326 (range 22-5362).
Conclusion: We found that the majority of participating hospitalized patients staying in single-occupancy patient rooms were able to mobilize. It appeared, however, that most of the patients who are physically capable of walking, do not reach the highest possible level of mobility according to the JH-HLM scale. Nurses should take their responsibility to ensure that patients achieve the highest possible level of mobility.
Keywords: Functional decline; Hospitalization; Mobility; Nursing.
© 2023. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no competing interests.
Similar articles
-
Extended mobility scale (AMEXO) for assessing mobilization and setting goals after gastrointestinal and oncological surgery: a before-after study.BMC Surg. 2022 Feb 2;22(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s12893-021-01445-3. BMC Surg. 2022. PMID: 35109840 Free PMC article.
-
Promoting mobility and reducing length of stay in hospitalized general medicine patients: A quality-improvement project.J Hosp Med. 2016 May;11(5):341-7. doi: 10.1002/jhm.2546. Epub 2016 Feb 5. J Hosp Med. 2016. PMID: 26849277
-
Toward a Common Language for Measuring Patient Mobility in the Hospital: Reliability and Construct Validity of Interprofessional Mobility Measures.Phys Ther. 2018 Feb 1;98(2):133-142. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzx110. Phys Ther. 2018. PMID: 29106679
-
Inter-rater reliability of the Johns Hopkins Highest Level of Mobility Scale (JH-HLM) in the intensive care unit.Braz J Phys Ther. 2021 May-Jun;25(3):352-355. doi: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2020.07.010. Epub 2020 Aug 8. Braz J Phys Ther. 2021. PMID: 32811787 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of postoperative mobilization measurements by activPAL versus Johns Hopkins Highest Level of Mobility scale after major abdominal surgery.Surgery. 2023 Oct;174(4):851-857. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2023.07.014. Epub 2023 Aug 12. Surgery. 2023. PMID: 37580218 Free PMC article.
References
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources