Cost-effectiveness analysis of upadacitinib as a treatment option for patients with rheumatoid arthritis in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
- PMID: 38163926
- DOI: 10.1080/13696998.2023.2299176
Cost-effectiveness analysis of upadacitinib as a treatment option for patients with rheumatoid arthritis in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Abstract
Aim: To evaluate cost-effectiveness of upadacitinib (targeted synthetic-disease modifying anti-rheumatic drug [ts-DMARD]) as first-line (1 L) treatment versus current treatment among patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA), who had an inadequate response to prior conventional-synthetic (csDMARDs) and/or biologic-DMARDs (bDMARDs).
Methods: This Excel-based model included patients with moderate (Disease Activity Score [DAS28]: >3.2 to ≤5.1) or severe RA (DAS28 > 5.1). Cost-effectiveness of current treatment (1 L: adalimumab-originator/biosimilar; second-line (2 L): other bDMARDs/tofacitinib) was compared against a new treatment involving two scenarios (1 L: upadacitinib, 2 L: adalimumab-biosimilar [scenario-1]/adalimumab-originator [scenario-2]) for a 10-year time-horizon from societal perspective. Model outcomes included direct and indirect costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), hospitalization days, number of orthopedic surgeries, and incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR) per QALY.
Results: With the current pathway, estimated total societal costs for 100 RA patients over 10-year period were Saudi Riyal (SAR) 50,450,354 (United States dollars [USD] 13,453,428) (moderate RA) and SAR50,013,945 (USD13,337,052) (severe RA). New pathway (scenario-1) showed that in patients with moderate-to-severe RA, upadacitinib led to higher QALY gain (+8.99 and +15.63) at lower societal cost (cost difference: -SAR2,023,522 [-USD539,606] and -SAR3,373,029 [-USD899,474], respectively). Thus, as 1 L, upadacitinib projects "dominant" ICUR per QALY over current pathway. Moreover, in alternate pathway (scenario-2), upadacitinib also projects "dominant" ICUR per QALY for patient with severe RA (QALY gain: +15.63; cost difference: -SAR 164,536 [-USD43,876]). However, moderate RA was associated with additional cost of SAR1,255,696 (USD334,852) for improved QALY (+8.99) over current pathway (ICUR per QALY: SAR139,742 [USD37,264]). Both scenarios resulted in reduced hospitalization days (scenario-1: -14.83 days; scenario-2: -11.41 days) and number of orthopedic surgeries (scenario-1: -8.36; scenario-2: -6.54) for moderate-to-severe RA over the current treatment pathway.
Conclusion: Upadacitinib as 1 L treatment in moderate-to-severe RA can considerably reduce healthcare resource burden in KSA, majorly due to reduced drug administration/monitoring/hospitalization/surgical and indirect costs.
Keywords: C; C5; C52; Costs and cost analysis; I; I1; I15; adalimumab-originator/ biosimilar; biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drug; cost-effectiveness; incremental cost utility ratio; kingdom of saudi arabia; quality-adjusted life-years; rheumatoid arthritis; tofacitinib; upadacitinib.
Similar articles
-
Cost-utility analysis of biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs), targeted synthetic DMARDs (tsDMARDs) and biosimilar DMARDs (bsDMARDs) combined with methotrexate for Thai rheumatoid arthritis patients with high disease activity.BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 May 31;23(1):561. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09595-1. BMC Health Serv Res. 2023. PMID: 37259090 Free PMC article.
-
Cost-Effectiveness of Biosimilars vs Leflunomide in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis.JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jun 3;7(6):e2418800. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.18800. JAMA Netw Open. 2024. PMID: 38922614 Free PMC article.
-
Cost-Effectiveness of Early Treatment with Originator Biologics or Their Biosimilars After Methotrexate Failure in Patients with Established Rheumatoid Arthritis.Adv Ther. 2019 Aug;36(8):2086-2095. doi: 10.1007/s12325-019-00986-7. Epub 2019 May 30. Adv Ther. 2019. PMID: 31148057 Free PMC article.
-
Tofacitinib for Treating Rheumatoid Arthritis After the Failure of Disease-Modifying Anti-rheumatic Drugs: An Evidence Review Group Perspective of a NICE Single Technology Appraisal.Pharmacoeconomics. 2018 Sep;36(9):1063-1072. doi: 10.1007/s40273-018-0639-0. Pharmacoeconomics. 2018. PMID: 29546668 Review.
-
Sarilumab for Previously-Treated Moderate or Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis: An Evidence Review Group Perspective of a NICE Single Technology Appraisal.Pharmacoeconomics. 2018 Dec;36(12):1427-1437. doi: 10.1007/s40273-018-0677-7. Pharmacoeconomics. 2018. PMID: 29882210 Review.
Cited by
-
Cost-effectiveness of Upadacitinib vs. Tofacitinib for moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis in China.Immunotherapy. 2024;16(18-19):1141-1151. doi: 10.1080/1750743X.2024.2426972. Epub 2024 Nov 17. Immunotherapy. 2024. PMID: 39552168
-
Decision-Analytical Modelling of Medicines in the Middle East: A Systematic Review of Economic Evaluation Studies.Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2025 Jul;23(4):569-612. doi: 10.1007/s40258-024-00940-x. Epub 2025 Apr 12. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2025. PMID: 40221639
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous