Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Jul;42(3):487-501.
doi: 10.5534/wjmh.230118. Epub 2024 Jan 2.

Advances in Male Contraception: When Will the Novel Male Contraception be Available?

Affiliations
Review

Advances in Male Contraception: When Will the Novel Male Contraception be Available?

Jongwon Kim et al. World J Mens Health. 2024 Jul.

Abstract

Many contraceptive methods have been developed over the years due to high demand. However, female contraceptive pills and devices do not work for all females due to health conditions and side effects. Also, the number of males who want to actively participate in family planning is gradually increasing. However, the only contraceptive options currently available to males are condoms and vasectomy. Therefore, many male contraceptive methods, including medication (hormonal and non-hormonal therapy) and mechanical methods, are under development. Reversibility, safety, persistence, degree of invasion, promptness, and the suppression of anti-sperm antibody formation are essential factors in the development of male contraceptive methods. In this paper, male contraceptive methods under development are reviewed according to those essential factors. Furthermore, the timeline for the availability of a new male contraception is discussed.

Keywords: Azoospermia; Contraception; Contraceptive agents; Drug development; Spermatogenesis; Sterilization.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Percentage distribution of contraception used globally by females of reproductive age (15–49 years) in 2019. Caption: Percentage distribution of contraceptive methods (Left), percentage distribution of male contraceptive methods (Right). The withdrawal method is unreliable for contraception due to its high failure rate. Therefore, it is difficult to consider it as an actual contraceptive option for males.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Male contraception options that are currently available or in development. (A) Hypothalamic-pituitary-testicular axis feedback control process through exogenous administration of androgens and progestins in hormonal contraception, (B) various contraceptive methods targeting the vas deferens, (C) extra-body control of fertility using heat or ultrasound, (D) various non-hormonal contraceptive drugs that affect fertilization after spermatogenesis and maturation, (E) male condom. FSH: follicle stimulating hormone, LH: luteinizing hormone, GnRH: gonadotropin-releasing hormone.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. Research duration and stage of male contraceptive methods currently under development. Bars represent the period since the concept was first presented for each method in development. “Hormonal methods” refers to male-targeted hormonal methods only. RISUG and hormonal methods, which are in phase 3 clinical trials, are the male contraceptive methods closest to commercialization. RISUG: reversible inhibition of sperm under guidance, TSSK: testis-specific serine/threonine kinase.

Similar articles

  • Male contraception.
    Wu FC. Wu FC. Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 1996 Apr;10(1):1-23. doi: 10.1016/s0950-3552(96)80059-9. Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 1996. PMID: 8736719 Review.
  • [Male contraception].
    Demoulin A. Demoulin A. Rev Med Liege. 1984 Apr 1;39(7):266-72. Rev Med Liege. 1984. PMID: 6729295 French.
  • Hormonal male contraception: progress and prospects for the 21st century.
    Handelsman DJ. Handelsman DJ. Aust N Z J Med. 1995 Dec;25(6):808-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.1995.tb02885.x. Aust N Z J Med. 1995. PMID: 8770357 Review.
  • Status of male contraception.
    Davis JE. Davis JE. Obstet Gynecol Annu. 1977;6:355-69. Obstet Gynecol Annu. 1977. PMID: 337192 Review.
  • Canadian Contraception Consensus (Part 2 of 4).
    Black A, Guilbert E; Co-Authors; Costescu D, Dunn S, Fisher W, Kives S, Mirosh M, Norman WV, Pymar H, Reid R, Roy G, Varto H, Waddington A, Wagner MS, Whelan AM; Special Contributors; Ferguson C, Fortin C, Kielly M, Mansouri S, Todd N. Black A, et al. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2015 Nov;37(11):1033-9. doi: 10.1016/s1701-2163(16)30054-8. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2015. PMID: 26629725 English, French.

Cited by

References

    1. United Nations (UN) Contraceptive use by method 2019: data booklet. UN; 2019.
    1. Casey PM, MacLaughlin KL, Faubion SS. Impact of contraception on female sexual function. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2017;26:207–213. - PubMed
    1. Martin CW, Anderson RA, Cheng L, Ho PC, van der Spuy Z, Smith KB, et al. Potential impact of hormonal male contraception: cross-cultural implications for development of novel preparations. Hum Reprod. 2000;15:637–645. - PubMed
    1. Kost K, Singh S, Vaughan B, Trussell J, Bankole A. Estimates of contraceptive failure from the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth. Contraception. 2008;77:10–21. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Latack KR, Patel J, Moog D, Spencer D, Nguyen BT. Withdrawal method inquiries and user experiences: an analysis of content posted on 4 gendered forums on Reddit. Contraception. 2021;104:170–175. - PubMed