Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jan;13(1):e6903.
doi: 10.1002/cam4.6903. Epub 2024 Jan 1.

The influence of "bad news" and "neutral/good news" on patients' perception of physician empathy during oncology consultations

Mattias Tranberg  1   2 , Henrik Ekedahl  3 , Carl Johan Fürst  1   2 , Jacob Engellau  3
Affiliations

The influence of "bad news" and "neutral/good news" on patients' perception of physician empathy during oncology consultations

Mattias Tranberg et al. Cancer Med. 2024 Jan.

Abstract

Objectives: Being met with empathy increases information sharing, treatment coherence, and helps patients to recover faster. However, we do not know how the content of the conversation about disease progression, new treatments, or other issues concerning serious illness affects patients' perceptions of the physician's empathy, and thus, the quality of the conversation. This study aimed to test the hypothesis that patients will rate their physician lower following a "bad news" consultation using the consultation and relational empathy (CARE) measure.

Methods: A total of 186 outpatients from the Department of Oncology were recruited for this study. After meeting with a patient, the physician filled out a form, placing the patient in either the "bad news" group, or the "neutral/good news" group along with information about the patient and the consultation. The patient was given the CARE measure after the visit.

Results: The patients who had received bad news rated their physicians a significantly lower score on the CARE measure, even though the effect size was small, than those who had neutral/good news. On average, bad news consultations were 11 min longer.

Conclusions: Physicians need to be aware of the patients' need to be known and understood, in addition to having skills to attend to emotional cues and concerns, since the current study's finding could be a sign either of the content being projected onto the physician or that the physician is focused on the message rather than on the patient.

Keywords: CARE measure; bad news; empathy; oncology; patients; physicians.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bousquet G, Orri M, Revah‐Levy A, Winterman S, Brugière C, Verneui L. Breaking bad news in oncology: a metasynthesis. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(22):2437‐2443. doi:10.1200/JCO.2014.59.6759 - DOI - PubMed
    1. John LK, Blunden H, Liu H. Shooting the messenger. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2019;148:644‐666. doi:10.1037/xge0000586 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Matthews T, Baken D, Ross K, Ogilvie E, Kent L. The experiences of patients and their family members when receiving bad news about cancer: a qualitative meta‐synthesis. Psychooncology. 2019;28(12):2286‐2294. doi:10.1002/pon.5241 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Håkansson Eklund J, Summer Meranius M. Toward a consensus on the nature of empathy: a review of reviews. Patient Educ Couns. 2021;104(2):300‐307. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2020.08.022 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Vliet LMV, Epstein AS. Current state of the art and science of patient‐clinician communication in progressive disease: patients' need to know and need to feel known. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(31):3474‐3478. doi:10.1200/JCO.2014.56.0425 - DOI - PMC - PubMed