Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Apr 25;74(742):e290-e299.
doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2023.0258. Print 2024 May.

Exploring whether primary care networks can contribute to the national goal of reducing health inequalities: a mixed-methods study

Affiliations

Exploring whether primary care networks can contribute to the national goal of reducing health inequalities: a mixed-methods study

Lynsey Warwick-Giles et al. Br J Gen Pract. .

Abstract

Background: Significant health inequalities exist in England. Primary care networks (PCNs), comprised of GP practices, were introduced in England in 2019 with funding linked to membership. PCNs have been tasked with tackling health inequalities.

Aim: To consider how the design and introduction of PCNs might influence their ability to tackle health inequalities.

Design and setting: A sequential mixed-methods study of PCNs in England.

Method: Linear regression of annual PCN-allocated funding per workload-weighted patient on income deprivation score from 2019-2023 was used. Qualitative interviews and observations of PCNs and PCN staff were undertaken across seven PCN sites in England (July 2020-March 2022).

Results: Across 1243 networks in 2019-2020, a 10% higher level of income deprivation resulted in £0.31 (95% confidence interval [CI] = £0.25 to £0.37), 4.50%, less funding per weighted patient. In 2022-2023, the same difference in deprivation resulted in £0.16 (95% CI = £0.11 to £0.21), 0.60%, more funding. Qualitative interviews highlighted that, although there were requirements for PCNs to tackle health inequalities, the policy design, and PCN internal relationships and maturity, shaped and sometimes restricted how PCNs approached this task locally.

Conclusion: Allocated PCN funding has become more pro-poor over time, suggesting that the need to account for deprivation within funding models is understood by policymakers. The following additional approaches have been highlighted that could support PCNs to tackle inequalities: better management support; encouragement and support to redistribute funding internally to support practices serving more deprived populations; and greater specificity in service requirements.

Keywords: health inequalities; mixed methods; policy; primary care networks; primary health care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Scatterplot of payments per weighted patient by income deprivation per primary care network contract year 2019–2020 to 2022–2023.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Dahlgren G, Whitehead M. The Dahlgren-Whitehead model of health determinants: 30 years on and still chasing rainbows. Public Health. 2021. DOI: . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Williams E, Buck D, Babalolo G, Maguire E. What are health inequalities? King’s Fund; 2022. https://www.kingsfund.org.uk/publications/what-are-health-inequalities (accessed 12 Jan 2024).
    1. Black D, Morris J, Smith C, Townsend P. Inequalities in health: report of a research working group. London: Department of Health and Social Security; 1980.
    1. Acheson D. Independent inquiry into inequalities in health report. London: Department of Health; 1998. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a759e7c40f0b67b3d5c7e6f/... (accessed 12 Jan 2024).
    1. Wanless D. Securing our future health: taking a long-term view. London: HM Treasury; 2002. https://www.yearofcare.co.uk/sites/default/files/images/Wanless.pdf (accessed 12 Jan 2024).

LinkOut - more resources