Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jan 2;19(1):e0295767.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295767. eCollection 2024.

Outcomes following major thoracoabdominal cancer resection in adults with congenital heart disease

Affiliations

Outcomes following major thoracoabdominal cancer resection in adults with congenital heart disease

Sara Sakowitz et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: While advances in medical and surgical management have allowed >97% of congenital heart disease (CHD) patients to reach adulthood, a growing number are presenting with non-cardiovascular malignancies. Indeed, adults with CHD are reported to face a 20% increase in cancer risk, relative to others, and cancer has become the fourth leading cause of death among this population. Surgical resection remains a mainstay in management of thoracoabdominal cancers. However, outcomes following cancer resection among these patients have not been well established. Thus, we sought to characterize clinical and financial outcomes following major cancer resections among adult CHD patients.

Methods: The 2012-2020 National Inpatient Sample was queried for all adults (CHD or non-CHD) undergoing lobectomy, esophagectomy, gastrectomy, pancreatectomy, hepatectomy, or colectomy for cancer. To adjust for intergroup differences in baseline characteristics, entropy balancing was applied to generate balanced patient groups. Multivariable models were constructed to assess outcomes of interest.

Results: Of 905,830 patients undergoing cancer resection, 1,480 (0.2%) had concomitant CHD. The overall prevalence of such patients increased from <0.1% in 2012 to 0.3% in 2012 (P for trend<0.001). Following risk adjustment, CHD was linked with greater in-hospital mortality (AOR 2.00, 95%CI 1.06-3.76), as well as a notable increase in odds of stroke (AOR 8.94, 95%CI 4.54-17.60), but no statistically significant difference in cardiac (AOR 1.33, 95%CI 0.69-2.59) or renal complications (AOR 1.35, 95%CI 0.92-1.97). Further, CHD was associated with a +2.39 day incremental increase in duration of hospitalization (95%CI +1.04-3.74) and a +$11,760 per-patient increase in hospitalization expenditures (95%CI +$4,160-19,360).

Conclusions: While a growing number of patients with CHD are undergoing cancer resection, they demonstrate inferior clinical and financial outcomes, relative to others. Novel screening, risk stratification, and perioperative management guidelines are needed for these patients to provide evidence-based recommendations for this complex and unique cohort.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. CONSORT diagram of survey-weighted estimates.
Of 905,830 hospitalizations for elective resection for lung, esophageal, gastric, hepatocellular, pancreatic, and colon cancer tabulated in the 2012–2020 NIS, 1,480 (0.1%) had a prior congenital heart disease (CHD) diagnosis. All estimates represent survey-weighted methodology.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Cancer breakdown by CHD.
Relative to non-CHD, patients with CHD more frequently underwent lobectomy (41.2 vs 26.0%), pancreatectomy (14.2 vs 9.5%), and hepatectomy (3.4 vs 2.8%). However, they less often underwent colectomy (34.5 vs 53.1%) and esophagectomy (1.0 vs 1.8%, P<0.001).
Fig 3
Fig 3. Association of CHD with inferior clinical outcomes.
After entropy balance and risk adjustment, prior congenital heart disease (CHD) diagnosis was linked with greater likelihood of in-hospital mortality and stroke. No difference in odds of cardiac or renal complications was observed. * indicates statistical significance, P<0.05. Reference: Non-CHD. Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals.
Fig 4
Fig 4. CHD cohort linked with greater resource utilization.
After adjustment, the cohort of patients with concomitant congenital heart disease (CHD) demonstrated (A) a +2.39 day incremental increase in duration of hospitalization (95%CI +1.04–3.74), as well as (B) a +$11,760 per-patient increase in hospitalization expenditures (95%CI +$4,160–19,360).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Mandalenakis Z, Giang KW, Eriksson P, et al.. Survival in children with congenital heart disease: Have we reached a peak at 97%? J Am Heart Assoc. 2020;9(22). doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.017704 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Khairy P, Ionescu-Ittu R, MacKie AS, Abrahamowicz M, Pilote L, Marelli AJ. Changing mortality in congenital heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;56(14):1149–1157. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.03.085 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Afilalo J, Therrien J, Pilote L, Ionescu-Ittu R, Martucci G, Marelli AJ. Geriatric congenital heart disease: Burden of disease and predictors of mortality. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58(14):1509–1515. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.06.041 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Karazisi C, Dellborg M, Mellgren K, et al.. Risk of cancer in young and older patients with congenital heart disease and the excess risk of cancer by syndromes, organ transplantation and cardiac surgery: Swedish health registry study (1930−2017). Published online 2022. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2022.100407 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Campolo J, Annoni G, Giaccardi M, Andreassi MG. Congenital Heart Disease and the Risk of Cancer: An Update on the Genetic Etiology, Radiation Exposure Damage, and Future Research Strategies. J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2022;9(8). doi: 10.3390/jcdd9080245 - DOI - PMC - PubMed