Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jan 2;25(1):10.
doi: 10.1186/s12875-023-02239-7.

Expectations of general practitioners on a practice based research network in Germany- a qualitative study within the Bavarian Research Practice Network (BayFoNet)

Linda Sanftenberg  1 , Julia Stofella  2 , Katharina Mayr  3 , Armin Nassehi  3 , Annette Härdtlein  2 , Stefanie Stark  4 , Thomas Kühlein  4 , Peter Konstantin Kurotschka  5 , Ildikò Gágyor  5 , Stefanie Eck  6 , Antonius Schneider  6 , Melanie Bößenecker  7 , Marco Roos  7 , Tobias Dreischulte  2 , Jochen Gensichen  2 ; BayFoNet study group
Collaborators, Affiliations

Expectations of general practitioners on a practice based research network in Germany- a qualitative study within the Bavarian Research Practice Network (BayFoNet)

Linda Sanftenberg et al. BMC Prim Care. .

Abstract

Background: Despite general practitioners' (GPs') key role in Germany`s primary health care, clinical research in general practice is scarce. Clinical research is mainly conducted at inpatient facilities, although their results are rarely transferable. German GPs have no extra time or funding for research, as well as limited research training. To support clinical research in German primary health care, practice-based research networks (PBRNs) are developed. As they will be based on an active involvement of GPs, we need more information on GPs` participation-readiness. The aim of this study was to explore facilitators and barriers to participation in the Bavarian Research Practice Network (BayFoNet) from the GPs`perspective before clinical trials will be performed.

Methods: We have performed semi-structured qualitative interviews with a purposive sample of 20 Bavarian GPs in 2022 under the application of the consolidated framework for implementation research (CFIR). Transcriptions were analysed according to Kuckartz` qualitative content analysis. The five domains of the CFIR framework served as initial deductive codes.

Results: N = 14 interviewees already agreed to participate in BayFoNet, whereas n = 6 interviewees opted not to participate in BayFoNet at the time of data collection. Main facilitators to conduct clinical research within BayFoNet were the motivation to contribute to evidence strength and quality in general practice, professional development and training of practice staff, as well as networking. Barriers for an active participation were bad experiences with previous clinical studies and lack of resources.

Conclusions: PBRNS in Germany have to be promoted and the entire practice team has to be involved at an early stage of development. Professional training of general practice staff and a living network might enhance engagement. Participatory approaches could help to develop acceptable and feasible study designs. Furthermore, PBRNs should support patient recruitment and data collection in general practices and disseminate the results of their research projects regularly to maintain GPs` engagement.

Trial registration: DRKS00028805, NCT05667207.

Keywords: General practice; Implementation science; Participatory research; Practice based research network; Primary health care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Royen PV, Beyer M, Chevallier P, Eilat-Tsanani S, Lionis C, Peremans L, et al. The research agenda for general practice/family medicine and primary health care in Europe. Part 3. Results: Person centred care, comprehensive and holistic approach. Eur J Gen Pract. 2010;16(2):113–9. - PubMed
    1. Schloemer T, Schröder-Bäck P. Criteria for evaluating transferability of health interventions: a systematic review and thematic synthesis. Implement Sci. 2018;13(1):88. doi: 10.1186/s13012-018-0751-8. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rosemann T, Szecsenyi J. General practitioners' attitudes towards research in primary care: qualitative results of a cross sectional study. BMC Fam Pract. 2004;5(1):31. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-5-31. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Buntinx F, Mant D, Van den Bruel A, Donner-Banzhof N, Dinant GJ. Dealing with low-incidence serious diseases in general practice. Br J Gen Pract. 2011;61(582):43–46. doi: 10.3399/bjgp11X548974. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lane NE, Ling V, Glazier RH, Stukel TA. Primary care physician volume and quality of care for older adults with dementia: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Fam Pract. 2021;22(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s12875-021-01398-9. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data