Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2024 Jan 2;24(1):11.
doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-06199-9.

Global burden of potentially life-threatening maternal conditions: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Fitiwi Tinsae Baykemagn  1   2 , Girmatsion Fisseha Abreha  3 , Yibrah Berhe Zelelow  4 , Abadi Kidanemariam Berhe  5   6 , Alemayehu Bayray Kahsay  3
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Global burden of potentially life-threatening maternal conditions: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Fitiwi Tinsae Baykemagn et al. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. .

Abstract

Background: Potentially life-threatening maternal conditions (PLTCs) is an important proxy indicator of maternal mortality and the quality of maternal health services. It is helpful to monitor the rates of severe maternal morbidity to evaluate the quality of maternal care, particularly in low- and lower-middle-income countries. This study aims to systematically identify and synthesize available evidence on PLTCs.

Methods: We searched studies in English from 2009‒2023 in PubMed, the National Library of Medicine (NLM) Gateway, the POPLINE database, and the Science Direct website. The study team independently reviewed the illegibility criteria of the articles. Two reviewers independently appraised the included articles using the Joanna Briggs Instrument for observational studies. Disputes between the reviewers were resolved by consensus with a third reviewer. Meta-analysis was conducted in Stata version 16. The pooled proportion of PLTCs was calculated using the random effects model. The heterogeneity test was performed using the Cochrane Q test, and its level was determined using the I2 statistical result. Using Egger's test, the publication bias was assessed.

Result: Thirty-two cross-sectional, five case-control, and seven cohort studies published from 2009 to 2023 were included in the meta-analysis. The highest proportion of PLTC was 17.55% (95% CI: 15.51, 19.79) in Ethiopia, and the lowest was 0.83% (95% CI: 0.73, 0.95) in Iraq. The pooled proportion of PLTC was 6.98% (95% CI: 5.98-7.98). In the subgroup analysis, the pooled prevalence varied based on country income level: in low-income 13.44% (95% CI: 11.88-15.00) I2 = 89.90%, low-middle income 7.42% (95% CI: 5.99-8.86) I2 = 99.71%, upper-middle income 6.35% (95% CI: 4.21-8.50) I2 = 99.92%, and high-income 2.67% (95% CI: 2.34-2.99) I2 = 99.57%. Similarly, it varied based on the diagnosis criteria; WHO diagnosis criteria used 7.77% (95% CI: 6.10-9.44) I2 = 99.96% at P = 0.00, while the Centers for Disease Controls (CDC) diagnosis criteria used 2.19% (95% CI: 1.89-2.50) I2 = 99.41% at P = 0.00.

Conclusion: The pooled prevalence of PLTC is high globally, predominantly in low-income countries. The large disparity of potentially life-threatening conditions among different areas needs targeted intervention, particularly for women residing in low-income countries. The WHO diagnosis criteria minimize the underreporting of severe maternal morbidity.

Trial registration: CRD42023409229.

Keywords: Meta-analysis; Potential life-threatening; Severe maternal morbidity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PRISMA flow chart showing identification and selection of studies
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Forest plot showing the pooled prevalence of potentially life-threatening conditions
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Subgroup analysis for the prevalence of potentially life-threatening conditions by diagnostic criteria
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Subgroup analysis for the prevalence of potentially life-threatening conditions by economic level of countries
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Subgroup analysis for the prevalence of potentially life-threatening conditions by year of publication
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Subgroup analysis for the prevalence of potentially life-threatening conditions by study sample size
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Time trend prevalence of potentially life-threatening conditions from 2013 to 2022
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Cecatti JG, Souza JP, Parpinelli MA, Haddad SM, Camargo RS, Pacagnella RC, et al. Brazilian network for the surveillance of maternal potentially life-threatening morbidity and maternal near-miss and a multidimensional evaluation of their long-term consequences. Reprod Health. 2009;6(1):1–10. doi: 10.1186/1742-4755-6-15. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Souza P, Say L, Pattinson RC. Maternal near miss – towards a standard tool for monitoring the quality of maternal health care. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2009;23:287–296. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2009.01.007. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Norhayati MN, Hussain N, Hazlina N, Sulaiman Z, Azman MY. Severe maternal morbidity and near misses in tertiary hospitals, Kelantan, Malaysia : a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2016;16(229):1–13. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-2895-2. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization. Trends in maternal mortality 2000 to 2017: estimates by WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, World Bank Group and the United Nations Population Division. Sexual and Reproductive Health. 2019. 12 p. Available from: https://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/maternal-mortality-2....
    1. Baqui AH, Mitra D, Moin MI, Naher N, Quaiyum MA, Tshefu A, et al. The burden of severe maternal morbidity and association with adverse birth outcomes in sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia: protocol for a prospective cohort study. J Glob Health. 2016;6(2):020601. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources