Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jan 2;24(1):20.
doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-06181-5.

Pregnant women's satisfaction with the quality of antenatal care and the continued willingness to use health facility care in Lusaka district, Zambia

Affiliations

Pregnant women's satisfaction with the quality of antenatal care and the continued willingness to use health facility care in Lusaka district, Zambia

Ladislas Hibusu et al. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. .

Abstract

Background: Antenatal healthcare (ANC) reduces maternal and neonatal deaths in low-middle-income countries. Satisfaction with ANC services and perception of quality of care are critical determinants of service utilization. The study aimed to assess pregnant women's satisfaction with ANC and identify sociodemographic factors associated with satisfaction and their continued willingness to use or recommend the facility to relatives or friends, in Lusaka district, Zambia.

Methods: This was a cross-sectional study involving 499 pregnant women in Lusaka district. A combination of stratified, multistage, and systematic sampling procedures was used in selecting health facilities and pregnant women. This allowed the researcher to assess exposure and status simultaneously among individuals of interest in a population. Structured survey instruments and face-face-interview techniques were used in collecting data among pregnant women who were receiving ANC in selected health facilities.

Results: Overall, the proportion of pregnant women who were fully satisfied with ANC was 58.9% (n = 292). Pregnant women's satisfaction score ranged from physical aspects (40.9 - 58.3%), interpersonal aspects (54.3 - 57.9%) to technical aspects of care (46.9 - 58.7%). Husbands' employment status (OR = 0.611, 95%CI = 0.413 - 0.903, p = 0.013), monthly household income level of > 3000 - ≤6000 Kwacha (OR = 0.480, 95%CI = 0.243 - 0.948, p = 0.035 were significantly associated with the interpersonal aspects and the physical aspects of care, respectively. Besides, pregnant women who were in their third trimester (above 33 weeks), significantly predicted satisfaction with the physical environment of antenatal care (OR = 3.932, 95%CI = 1.349 - 11.466, p = 0.012). In terms of the type of health facility, women who utilized ANC from Mtendere (OR = 0.236, 95% CI = 0.093 - 0.595, p = 0.002) and N'gombe (OR = 0.179, 95% CI = 0.064 - 0.504, p = 0.001) clinics were less satisfied with the physical environment of care. Place of residence and educational attainment showed significant association with 'willingness to return'. N'gombe clinic (n = 48, 77.4%) received the lowest consideration for 'future care'.

Conclusion: Drawing on Donabedian framework on assessing quality of healthcare, we posit that pregnant women's satisfaction with the quality of antenatal care was low due to concerns about the physical environment of health facilities, the interpersonal relationships between providers and pregnant women as well as the technical aspects of care. All these accounted for pregnant women's dissatisfaction with the quality of care, and the indication of unwillingness to return or recommend the health facilities to colleagues. Consistent with Donabedian framework, we suggest that the codes and ethics of healthcare must be upheld. We also call for policy initiatives to reshape the physical condition of ANC clinics and to reinforce healthcare providers' focus on the 'structures' and the 'processes' relevant to care in addition to the 'outcomes'.

Keywords: Antenatal care; Healthcare acceptability; Maternal health services; Patient satisfaction, health care utilization; Zambia.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Factors that influence satisfaction with ANC. Adapted from Donabedian framework [26]
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Sampled health facilities and number of pregnant women interviewed
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Percentage change in the odds of satisfaction with ANC

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Musarandega R, Nyakura M, Machekano R, Pattinson R, Munjanja SP. Causes of maternal mortality in Sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review of studies published from 2015 to 2020. J Glob Health. 2021;11 - PMC - PubMed
    1. WHO . Trends in maternal mortality 2000 To 2017: estimates by WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, World Bank Group and the United Nations Population Division. 2019.
    1. Tunçalp Ӧ, Were W, MacLennan C, Oladapo O, Gülmezoglu A, Bahl R, Daelmans B, Mathai M, Say L, Kristensen F. Quality of care for pregnant women and newborns—the WHO vision. Bjog. 2015;122(8):1045. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13451. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ngxongo TSP: Basic antenatal care approach to antenatal care service provision. In: Selected topics in midwifery care. edn.: IntechOpen; 2018.
    1. Levesque J-F, Harris MF, Russell G. Patient-centred access to health care: conceptualising access at the interface of health systems and populations. Int J Equity Health. 2013;12:1–9. doi: 10.1186/1475-9276-12-18. - DOI - PMC - PubMed