Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jan 3;19(1):26.
doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-04505-x.

The effects of postoperative malrotation alignment on outcomes of Gartland type III/IV paediatric supracondylar humeral fractures treated by close reduction and percutaneous K-wire fixation

Affiliations

The effects of postoperative malrotation alignment on outcomes of Gartland type III/IV paediatric supracondylar humeral fractures treated by close reduction and percutaneous K-wire fixation

Cao Chen et al. J Orthop Surg Res. .

Abstract

Purpose: In this study, we aimed to investigate the effects of postoperative malrotation alignment on the outcomes of Gartland type III/IV paediatric supracondylar humeral fracture (SCHF) treated by close reduction and percutaneous K-wire fixation.

Methods: Between January 2014 and December 2021, 295 Gartland type III/IV paediatric SCHFs treated by close reduction and percutaneous K-wire fixation were selected for this retrospective study. The demographic, clinical and radiographic parameters of all cases were collected. The lateral rotation percentage (LRP) was measured on X-rays to evaluate postoperative malrotation alignment of the fracture. All cases were categorized into 4 groups according to LRP: LRP ≤ 10% (210, 71.2%), 10% < LRP ≤ 20% (41, 13.9%), 20% < LRP ≤ 30% (26, 8.8%) and LRP > 30% (18, 6.1%). The carrying angle, ranges of multidirectional motions, Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) and Flynn's Standard Score (FSS) of the injured elbow were assessed 6 months postoperation and compared among different groups. ROC analysis based on LRP and the excellent/good rate of FSS was performed to determine the acceptable maximum degree of postoperative malrotation alignment.

Results: There was no difference in the demographic characteristics (age, sex, injured side and fracture type), postoperative Baumann angle, carrying angle or range of forearm rotation among the 4 groups (P > 0.05). The operation time and time from operation to K-wire removal were longer in the 20% < LRP ≤ 30% and LRP > 30% groups than in the LRP < 10% and 10% < LRP ≤ 20% groups (P < 0.001). The shaft condylar angle, range of elbow flexion, MEPS and FSS of the injured elbow 6 months postoperatively were lower in the 20% < LRP ≤ 30% and LRP > 30% groups than in the LRP < 10% and 10% < LRP ≤ 20% groups (P < 0.001). ROC analysis based on LRP and the excellent/good rate of FSS showed an area under the curve of 0.959 (95% CI 0.936-0.983), with a cutoff value of 26.5%, sensitivity of 95.3% and specificity of 90.1%.

Conclusion: A certain degree of residual malrotation alignment deformity of the SCHF may reduce the shaft condylar angle and extend the time from operation to removing the K-wire and affect elbow function, especially the range of elbow flexion. The acceptable maximum degree of residual malrotation deformity expressed as the LRP value was 26.5%.

Keywords: Gartland type III/IV; Malrotation; Outcomes; Supracondylar humeral fracture.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Measurement of LRP. On the lateral X-ray, the forward shift of the proximal humeral cortex a was divided by the width of the distal humerus b at the fracture site, and the value was multiplied by 100 to be the LRP
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Flowchart of participants throughout the study
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Measurement of the Baumann angle (a) and SCA (b) on the frontal and lateral X-rays, respectively
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Measurement of ranges of multidirectional motions and the carrying angle of the injured elbow. a Forearm pronation and supination; b elbow flexion, limitation of elbow extension (negative value) and elbow hyperextension (positive value); c the carrying angle
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
The ROC curve analysis based on LRP and the excellent/good rate of FSS

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Omid R, Choi PD, Skaggs DL. Supracondylar humeral fractures in children. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90(5):1121–1132. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.G.01354. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Otsuka NY, Kasser JR. Supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 1997;5(1):19–26. doi: 10.5435/00124635-199701000-00003. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cheng JC, Lam TP, Maffulli N. Epidemiological features of supracondylar fractures of the humerus in Chinese children. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2001;10(1):63–67. - PubMed
    1. Susan TMCDM, Mininder SK. Operative management of displaced flexion supracondylar humerus fractures in children. J Pediatr Orthop. 2007;27(5):551–556. doi: 10.1097/01.bpb.0000279032.04892.6c. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gartland JJ. Management of supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1959;109(2):145–54. - PubMed