Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jan 2;14(1):113.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-50434-4.

Impact of radiation doses on clinical relapse of biochemically recurrent prostate cancer after prostatectomy

Affiliations

Impact of radiation doses on clinical relapse of biochemically recurrent prostate cancer after prostatectomy

Seiya Takano et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

The relationship between radiation doses and clinical relapse in patients receiving salvage radiotherapy (SRT) for biochemical recurrence (BCR) after radical prostatectomy (RP) remains unclear. We identified 292 eligible patients treated with SRT between 2005 and 2018 at 15 institutions. Clinical relapse-free survival (cRFS) between the ≥ 66 Gy (n = 226) and < 66 Gy groups (n = 66) were compared using the Log-rank test, followed by univariate and multivariate analyses and a subgroup analysis. After a median follow-up of 73 months, 6-year biochemical relapse-free survival, cRFS, cancer-specific survival, and overall survival rates were 58, 92, 98, and 94%, respectively. Six-year cRFS rates in the ≥ 66 Gy and < 66 Gy groups were 94 and 87%, respectively (p = 0.022). The multivariate analysis revealed that Gleason score ≥ 8, seminal vesicle involvement, PSA at BCR after RP ≥ 0.5 ng/ml, and a dose < 66 Gy correlated with clinical relapse (p = 0.015, 0.012, 0.024, and 0.0018, respectively). The subgroup analysis showed the consistent benefit of a dose ≥ 66 Gy in patients across most subgroups. Doses ≥ 66 Gy were found to significantly, albeit borderline, increase the risk of late grade ≥ 2 GU toxicity compared to doses < 66 Gy (14% vs. 3.2%, p = 0.055). This large multi-institutional retrospective study demonstrated that a higher SRT dose (≥ 66 Gy) resulted in superior cRFS.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of the study cohort. SRT salvage radiotherapy, BCR biochemical recurrence, RP radical prostatectomy, PSA prostate-specific antigen, ADT androgen deprivation therapy, EQD2 equivalent dose in 2-Gy fractions.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Kaplan–Meier curves of biochemical relapse-free survival (bRFS), clinical relapse-free survival (cRFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS) for all patients (n = 292) receiving salvage radiotherapy for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Kaplan–Meier curves of clinical relapse-free survival (cRFS) for patients receiving total doses of ≥ 66 Gy (n = 226) vs. < 66 Gy (n = 66) in an equivalent dose in 2-Gy fractions (EQD2).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Effects of radiation doses by clinical and pathological risk factors. EQD2 equivalent dose in 2-Gy fractions, HR hazard ratio, 95% CI 95% confidence interval, SVI seminal vesicle involvement, PSA prostate-specific antigen, BCR biochemical recurrence, RP radical prostatectomy, ECE extracapsular extension, SRT salvage radiotherapy.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Cumulative incidence curves of late grade 2 or higher (a) genitourinary and (b) gastrointestinal toxicities for patients receiving total doses of ≥ 66 Gy (n = 226) vs. < 66 Gy (n = 66) in an equivalent dose in 2-Gy fractions (EQD2).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Stephenson AJ, et al. Preoperative nomogram predicting the 10-year probability of prostate cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy. JNCI J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2006;98:715–717. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djj190. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Michalski JM, et al. Effect of standard vs dose-escalated radiation therapy for patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer: The NRG oncology RTOG 0126 randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol. 2018;4:e180039. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.0039. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Moore KL, et al. Quantifying unnecessary normal tissue complication risks due to suboptimal planning: A secondary study of RTOG 0126. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2015;92:228–235. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2015.01.046. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ohri N, Dicker AP, Trabulsi EJ, Showalter TN. Can early implementation of salvage radiotherapy for prostate cancer improve the therapeutic ratio? A systematic review and regression meta-analysis with radiobiological modelling. Eur. J. Cancer. 2012;48:837–844. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2011.08.013. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. King CR. The dose–response of salvage radiotherapy following radical prostatectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Radiother. Oncol. 2016;121:199–203. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2016.10.026. - DOI - PubMed

Substances